Transition to practice: can rural interprofessional education make a difference? A cohort study

被引:25
|
作者
Pullon, Susan [1 ]
Wilson, Christine [1 ]
Gallagher, Peter [2 ]
Skinner, Margot [3 ]
McKinlay, Eileen [1 ]
Gray, Lesley [1 ]
McHugh, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Primary Hlth Care & Gen Practice, POB 7343, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Med Educ Unit, POB 7343, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Otago, Sch Physiotherapy, 325 Great King St,POB 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
来源
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Health sciences students; Interprofessional education; Interdisciplinary; Pre-registration; Indigenous health; Rural health; HEALTH; IMPACT; CARE; PROFESSIONALS; UNIVERSITY; ATTITUDES; STUDENTS; PROJECT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-016-0674-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The transition from student to health practitioner at entry-to-practice is complex, requiring critical acquisition of collaborative practice skills. In rural communities where health need is multidimensional, there is potential for multiple intentional collaborative learning objectives to be met concurrently. A five-week, rurally-located, clinically-based interprofessional programme was introduced as a transition-to-practice rotation for final-year, pre-registration health professional students in the professions of dentistry, dietetics, medicine, nursing, pharmacy and physiotherapy. The programme integrated learning objectives in four related domains: interprofessional practice; hauora Maori (Maori health); rural health; long-term condition management. This study investigated student learning experiences over the first two complete years of the programme, comparing responses from participating students with those from a cohort of non-participating peers. Methods: Using a pre and post quasi-experimental design, respondents from two successive student year cohorts completed questionnaires at the start and end of their final year. Additional survey data were collected from participating students at the end of each rotation. Results: 131 students participated in the programme during 2013-2014. Participating student respondents (55/131; 42 %) reported being significantly better prepared than a cohort of 56 non-participating colleagues in many aspects of their understanding of and knowledge about each of four key learning domains. 94 % (123/131) of programme participants completed end-of-rotation questionnaires. Positive from the outset (mean 5-point Likert scale scores between 3 and 5; 5 = most positive), student satisfaction further increased across all domains in the second year (mean 5-point Likert scale scores between 4 and 5). Conclusions: At entry-to-practice level, multiple learning objectives, including indigenous health learning, can be met simultaneously in the clinical context within an integrated, rotational programme. Rural settings are highly suitable for delivering such programmes if well supported.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transition to practice: can rural interprofessional education make a difference? A cohort study
    Susan (Sue) Pullon
    Christine Wilson
    Peter Gallagher
    Margot Skinner
    Eileen McKinlay
    Lesley Gray
    Patrick McHugh
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 16
  • [2] Interprofessional education for interprofessional practice: does it make a difference?
    Piterman, Leon
    Newton, Jennifer M.
    Canny, Benedict J.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 193 (02) : 92 - 93
  • [3] Interprofessional learning and practice can make a difference
    Greenfield, David R.
    Nugus, Peter
    Travaglia, Joanne F.
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2011, 194 (07) : 364 - 365
  • [4] Does Interprofessional Education Make a Difference to Students' Attitudes to Practice?
    Coleman, Karen
    Ben Darlow
    McKinlay, Eileen
    Beckingsale, Louise
    Donovan, Sarah
    Stanley, James
    Gallagher, Peter
    Ben Gray
    Neser, Hazel
    Perry, Meredith
    Pullon, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2014, 45 (04) : 344 - 345
  • [5] Can interprofessional education make a difference in the care of people with chronic disease?
    Ross, Fiona
    Harris, Ruth
    [J]. CHRONIC ILLNESS, 2005, 1 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [6] Can teacher education make a difference?
    Brouwer, N
    Korthagen, F
    [J]. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (01) : 153 - 224
  • [7] Stereotyping as a barrier to collaboration: Does interprofessional education make a difference?
    Ateah, Christine A.
    Snow, Wanda
    Wener, Pamela
    MacDonald, Laura
    Metge, Colleen
    Davis, Penny
    Fricke, Moni
    Ludwig, Sora
    Anderson, Judy
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2011, 31 (02) : 208 - 213
  • [8] Rural Diabetes Education: Does It Make a Difference?
    Bowman, Ann
    Epp, Donna
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2005, 37 (01) : 34 - 53
  • [9] Interprofessional education in rural practice: how, when and where?
    Hays, R. B.
    [J]. RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2008, 8 (02):
  • [10] The rural and interprofessional education and collaborative practice interface: Findings from a qualitative study
    Martin, Priya
    Argus, Geoff
    Ford, Martelle
    Barnett, Tessa
    Graham, Nicola
    Hill, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2024, 38 (01) : 182 - 185