A Survey on Expert Recommendation in Community Question Answering

被引:58
|
作者
Wang, Xianzhi [1 ]
Huang, Chaoran [2 ]
Yao, Lina [2 ]
Benatallah, Boualem [2 ]
Dong, Manqing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Software, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
community question answering; expert recommendation; challenge; solution; future direction; LANGUAGE MODELS; AUTHORITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11390-018-1845-0
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Community question answering (CQA) represents the type of Web applications where people can exchange knowledge via asking and answering questions. One significant challenge of most real-world CQA systems is the lack of effective matching between questions and the potential good answerers, which adversely affects the efficient knowledge acquisition and circulation. On the one hand, a requester might experience many low-quality answers without receiving a quality response in a brief time; on the other hand, an answerer might face numerous new questions without being able to identify the questions of interest quickly. Under this situation, expert recommendation emerges as a promising technique to address the above issues. Instead of passively waiting for users to browse and find their questions of interest, an expert recommendation method raises the attention of users to the appropriate questions actively and promptly. The past few years have witnessed considerable efforts that address the expert recommendation problem from different perspectives. These methods all have their issues that need to be resolved before the advantages of expert recommendation can be fully embraced. In this survey, we first present an overview of the research efforts and state-of-the-art techniques for the expert recommendation in CQA. We next summarize and compare the existing methods concerning their advantages and shortcomings, followed by discussing the open issues and future research directions.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 653
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Expert Recommendation in Community Question Answering via Heterogeneous Content Network Embedding
    Li, Hong
    Li, Jianjun
    Li, Guohui
    Gao, Rong
    Yan, Lingyu
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2023, 75 (01): : 1687 - 1709
  • [12] Question recommendation and answer extraction in question answering community
    Xianfeng, Yang
    Pengfei, Liu
    International Journal of Database Theory and Application, 2016, 9 (01): : 35 - 44
  • [13] An IoT-based Approach to Expert Recommendation in Community Question Answering for Disaster Recovery
    Macri, Davide
    Gentile, Antonio Francesco
    Sabatino, Pietro
    2023 23RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS, ICDMW 2023, 2023, : 860 - 867
  • [14] User correlation model for question recommendation in community question answering
    Chaogang Fu
    Applied Intelligence, 2020, 50 : 634 - 645
  • [15] On dynamicity of expert finding in community question answering
    Neshati, Mahmood
    Fallahnejad, Zohreh
    Beigy, Hamid
    INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 53 (05) : 1026 - 1042
  • [16] Question Recommendation in Medical Community-Based Question Answering
    Cai, Hong
    Yan, Cuiting
    Yin, Airu
    Zhao, Xuesong
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, ICONIP 2017, PT V, 2017, 10638 : 228 - 236
  • [17] User intimacy model for question recommendation in community question answering
    Fu, Chaogang
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2020, 188
  • [18] Dual Role Model for Question Recommendation in Community Question Answering
    Xu, Fei
    Ji, Zongcheng
    Wang, Bin
    SIGIR 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2012, : 771 - 779
  • [19] User correlation model for question recommendation in community question answering
    Fu, Chaogang
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 50 (02) : 634 - 645
  • [20] Expert finding in community question answering: a review
    Yuan, Sha
    Zhang, Yu
    Tang, Jie
    Hall, Wendy
    Cabota, Juan Bautista
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2020, 53 (02) : 843 - 874