The SF-36 component summary scales and the daytime diurnal cortisol profile

被引:14
|
作者
Hagger-Johnson, Gareth Edward [1 ]
Whiteman, Martha C. [2 ]
Wawrzyniak, Andrew J. [3 ]
Holroyd, Warren G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Moray House Sch Educ, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Clin Psychol, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[4] NHS Wakefield Dist, Wakefield, England
关键词
Biomarkers; Cortisol; Health status; Stress; Surrogate marker; Quality of life; SALIVARY CORTISOL; STRESS; CANCER; HEALTH; ALLOSTASIS; SYMPTOMS; DISEASE; RHYTHM;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-010-9626-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Higher daytime cortisol output has been associated with higher levels of perceived stress and worse mental and physical health outcomes. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, such as elevated secretion of daytime cortisol, occurs in many mental and physical illnesses. However, the nature of the association between functional health status and daytime cortisol production has not been established. Methods Healthy adult volunteers (n = 68, 45 females) provided saliva samples 3, 6, 9 and 12 h after waking, for two consecutive days, in everyday settings. Bivariate correlations between log salivary cortisol concentrations were calculated, and the SF-36 component summary scores were calculated. Latent growth curve modeling was used to model the daytime profile and adjust for covariates (age, sex and waking time). Results Higher PCS scores were not associated with cortisol three hours after waking (cortisol intercept), or the diurnal decline ( cortisol slope). Higher MCS scores were correlated with faster cortisol decline across the day (r = -.31, P <.01) but not with cortisol intercepts. In a latent growth curve model adjusting for age, sex and waking time, the association was no longer statistically significant. Conclusions Large scale epidemiological studies involving salivary cortisol would benefit from measuring SF-36 component summary scores. Cortisol intercepts and slopes may be differentially related to the PCS and MCS, although greater statistical power is needed to test this hypothesis more fully. Associations between daytime cortisol and the PCS or MCS could reflect the regulatory competence of bodily systems, common causes or unmeasured confounding factors.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 651
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The SF-36 component summary scales and the daytime diurnal cortisol profile
    Gareth Edward Hagger-Johnson
    Martha C. Whiteman
    Andrew J. Wawrzyniak
    Warren G. Holroyd
    Quality of Life Research, 2010, 19 : 643 - 651
  • [2] The SF-36 summary scales: Problems and solutions
    Wilson, D
    Parsons, J
    Tucker, G
    SOZIAL-UND PRAVENTIVMEDIZIN, 2000, 45 (06): : 239 - 246
  • [3] Exhaustion measured by the SF-36 vitality scale is associated with a flattened diurnal cortisol profile
    Lindeberg, Sara I.
    Eek, Frida
    Lindbladh, Eva
    Ostergren, Per-Olof
    Hansen, Ase Marie
    Karlson, Bjoern
    PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2008, 33 (04) : 471 - 477
  • [4] SF-36 Summary scales: problems in mental health research
    Schmitz, N
    Kruse, J
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (06) : S76 - S76
  • [5] Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population
    Nortvedt, MW
    Riise, T
    Myhr, KM
    Nyland, HI
    MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (10) : 1022 - 1028
  • [6] SF-36 scales in the relaxin study
    Khanna, D.
    Park, G. S.
    Seibold, J.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (04) : 724 - 724
  • [7] The SF-36 summary scales were valid, reliable, and equivalent in a Chinese population
    Lam, CLK
    Tse, EYY
    Gandek, B
    Fong, DYT
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (08) : 815 - 822
  • [8] Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores?
    Charles Taft
    Jan Karlsson
    Marianne Sullivan
    Quality of Life Research, 2001, 10 : 395 - 404
  • [9] Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores?
    Taft, C
    Karlsson, J
    Sullivan, M
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (05) : 395 - 404
  • [10] The SF-36 scales are not accurately summarised by independent physical and mental component scores
    Mark Hann
    David Reeves
    Quality of Life Research, 2008, 17