Use of online tools for antimicrobial resistance prediction by whole-genome sequencing in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE)

被引:17
|
作者
Babiker, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Mustapha, Mustapha M. [2 ]
Pacey, Marissa P. [2 ]
Shutt, Kathleen A. [1 ,2 ]
Ezeonwuka, Chinelo D. [2 ]
Ohm, Sara L. [2 ]
Cooper, Vaughn S. [3 ]
Marsh, Jane W. [2 ]
Doi, Yohei [1 ]
Harrison, Lee H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Infect Dis Epidemiol Res Unit, Microbial Genom Epidemiol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Microbiol & Mol Genet, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA; Vancomycin-resistant enterococci; VRE; Whole-genome sequencing; Antimicrobial resistance; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; IDENTIFICATION; DIAGNOSTICS; MECHANISMS; MORTALITY; BLOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgar.2019.04.006
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: The antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis represents a serious threat to public health and has resulted in concentrated efforts to accelerate development of rapid molecular diagnostics for AMR. In combination with publicly available web-based AMR databases, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offers the capacity for rapid detection of AMR genes. Here we studied the concordance between WGS-based resistance prediction and phenotypic susceptibility test results for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) clinical isolates using publicly available tools and databases. Methods: Clinical isolates prospectively collected at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between December 2016 and December 2017 underwent WGS. The AMR gene content was assessed from assembled genomes by BLASTn search of online databases. Concordance between the WGS-predicted resistance profile and phenotypic susceptibility as well as the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each antibiotic/organism combination, using the phenotypic results as gold standard. Results: Phenotypic susceptibility testing and WGS results were available for 1242 isolate/antibiotic combinations. Overall concordance was 99.3%, with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 98.7% (95% CI 97.2-99.5%), 99.6% (95% CI 98.8-99.9%), 99.3% (95% CI 98.0-99.8%) and 99.2% (95% CI 98.3-99.7%), respectively. Additional identification of point mutations in housekeeping genes increased the concordance to 99.4%, sensitivity to 99.3% (95% CI 98.2-99.8%) and NPV to 99.4% (95% CI 98.4-99.8%). Conclusion: WGS can be used as a reliable predicator of phenotypic resistance both for MRSA and VRE using readily available online tools. (C) 2019 International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bringing resistance modulation to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) strains using a quaternary ammonium compound coupled with zinc oxide nanoparticles
    Fateme Eskandari
    Hossein Mofidi
    Bahar Asheghi
    Fateme Mohammadi
    Ahmad Gholami
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2023, 39
  • [22] Vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: The Gram-positive challenges
    Mouthon, L
    Mainardi, JL
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 9 (04) : 256 - 260
  • [23] Linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance in vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prior to clinical use in Turkey
    Baysallar, M
    Kilic, A
    Aydogan, H
    Cilli, F
    Doganci, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2004, 23 (05) : 510 - 512
  • [24] Confounding by indication affects antimicrobial risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus but not vancomycin-resistant enterococci acquisition
    Datta, Rupak
    Kleinman, Ken
    Rifas-Shiman, Sheryl
    Placzek, Hilary
    Lankiewicz, Julie
    Platt, Richard
    Huang, Susan S.
    ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AND INFECTION CONTROL, 2014, 3
  • [25] Confounding by indication affects antimicrobial risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus but not vancomycin-resistant enterococci acquisition
    Rupak Datta
    Ken Kleinman
    Sheryl Rifas-Shiman
    Hilary Placzek
    Julie Lankiewicz
    Richard Platt
    Susan S Huang
    Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 3
  • [26] Prediction rules to identify patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci upon hospital admission
    Furuno, JP
    Harris, AD
    Wright, MO
    McGregor, JC
    Venezia, RA
    Zhu, JK
    Perencevich, EN
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2004, 32 (08) : 436 - 440
  • [27] Is there a higher prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization in patients with antibiotic allergy labels?
    Lam, Weyman
    Staicu, Mary L.
    Conn, Kelly M.
    Ramsey, Allison Clare
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2020, 48 (06) : 663 - 667
  • [28] Antibiotic and biocide resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus
    Suller, MTE
    Russell, AD
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1999, 43 (04) : 281 - 291
  • [29] Methicillin- and Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Isolated from Hospital Foods: Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns
    Asma Afshari
    Sanaz Taheri
    Mohammad Hashemi
    Abdolreza Norouzy
    Mohsen Nematy
    Sara Mohamadi
    Current Microbiology, 2022, 79
  • [30] Effect of Cessation of Contact Isolation for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
    Rupp, Mark E.
    Fitzgerald, Teresa
    Hayes, Kim
    Van Schooneveld, Trevor
    Hewlett, Angela
    Clevenger, Ryan
    Lyden, Elizabeth
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (08): : 1005 - 1007