Decarbonisation of islands: A multi-criteria decision analysis platform and application

被引:15
|
作者
Barney, Andrew [1 ]
Polatidis, Heracles [1 ]
Haralambopoulos, Dias [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Cramergatan 3, S-62157 Visby, Sweden
[2] Univ Aegean, Dept Environm, Univ Hill, Mitilini 81100, Lesvos, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Sustainable islands; Life-cycle assessment; Energy autonomy; Multi-criteria decision analysis; CYCLE ASSESSMENT LCA; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ENERGY; AID; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2022.102115
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper the REACT-DECARB energy planning platform, designed to assist with the assessment of decarbonisation scenarios for islands' electricity grids, is fully presented and applied to eight (8) EU islands. The scenarios were developed in the context of a Horizon 2020 EU project employing a renewable energy production forecasting and an optimisation mixed-integer linear programming model. The platform employs energy and economic modules, life-cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis to facilitate the integrated evaluation of scenarios and enables decision makers to fully grasp the technical, environmental, economic and social aspects of energy systems' decarbonisation. Results indicate that island electrical autonomy should be considered with caution and can be a valid option only if cost criteria are not prioritised. Further, it was determined that seeking autonomy in countries with low carbon costs for electricity production may be not be environmentally beneficial. A number of inter-island comparisons have been made and have shown that the REACT-DECARB platform can assist planners and decision-makers to identify the best available scenarios, define the sensitivity issues with respect to the criteria weights and, together with local communities, come to a common ground in order to establish a roadmap for the transition towards a decarbonised energy future for islands.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An application of the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making analysis to a regional multi-airport system
    Postorino, Maria Nadia
    Pratico, Filippo Giammaria
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 4 : 44 - 52
  • [32] Multi-criteria decision analysis based on rough sets
    An, Li-Ping
    Chen, Zeng-Qiang
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2013, 28 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [33] Professor Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Hein, Nelson
    Kroenke, Adriana
    Rodrigues Junior, Moacir Manoel
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, ITQM 2015, 2015, 55 : 539 - 548
  • [34] On the Similarities of Some Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods
    Geldermann, Jutta
    Schoebel, Anita
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (3-4) : 219 - 230
  • [35] The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Monat, Jamie P.
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 4 (06): : 492 - 508
  • [36] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Nautical Anchorage Selection
    Pusic, Danijel
    Lusic, Zvonimir
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [37] The application of multi-criteria analysis to substation design
    Atanackovic, D
    McGillis, DT
    Galiana, FD
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1998, 13 (03) : 1172 - 1178
  • [38] Inclusion of Ethical Aspects in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Sapienza, Gaetana
    Dodig-Crnkovic, Gordana
    Crnkovic, Ivica
    PROCEEDINGS 2016 1ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DECISION MAKING IN SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE, 2016, : 1 - 8
  • [39] Mindsets, Rationality and Emotion in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Wenstop, Fred
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2005, 13 (04) : 161 - 172
  • [40] Raising the bar: strategic multi-criteria decision analysis
    Montibeller, G.
    Franco, L. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2011, 62 (05) : 855 - 867