The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement

被引:4
|
作者
Dopkins, Stephen [1 ]
Sargent, Jesse [2 ]
Ngo, Catherine Trinh [3 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Recognition; Response bias; Sequential effects; LEXICAL DECISION; CRITERION-SHIFT; BASE-RATE; MEMORY; CHOICE; MODELS; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION; FREQUENCY; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1080/09658211003601506
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
On each trial of the experimental procedure the participant read a list of words and made successive recognition judgements to multiple test words. The bias for a given recognition judgement was more conservative if the judgement followed a correct positive response to a target than if it followed a correct negative response to a lure. Similar results were not observed for successive semantic recognition judgements. The bias shift was greater when the study list was short than when the list was long. The results suggest that participants in a recognition task have a sense of the size of the set of targets that might possibly be presented on the next trial and that, under conditions in which a word can only be presented once during the test phase, their bias becomes more conservative after a positive response to a target because the set is depleted.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 283
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Judgement and ranking: living with hidden bias
    Osorio, Antonio
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 253 (01) : 501 - 518
  • [22] Distribution network monitoring and management system based on intelligent recognition and judgement
    Xue, Yiwei
    Sun, Qizhen
    Li, Chendi
    Dang, Weijun
    Hao, Fangzhou
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND NONLINEAR SCIENCES, 2022, 7 (01) : 685 - 694
  • [23] Comprehensive indices of early judgement for earthquake sequence type by pattern recognition
    Zhou, Cui-Ying
    Zhang, Yu-Xia
    Wang, Hong-Wei
    Jiao, Li-Qiang
    Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1996, 9 (01):
  • [24] Getting better judgement working party: bias, guess and expert judgement, in actuarial work
    Overton, T. P.
    Tredger, E. R. W.
    Scullion, C. A.
    Haria, S.
    Lo, J. T. H.
    Spain, J. G.
    Smith, A. D.
    Slee, M.
    White, M. G.
    Tripp, M. H.
    Llanwarne, T. J.
    Simmonds, D.
    Newman, A. J.
    BRITISH ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (03) : 579 - 599
  • [25] Improving Face Recognition by Pose-Aware Quality Assessment and Judgement
    Cao, Zhicheng
    Shi, Liyi
    Ju, Hua
    Yang, Li
    Pang, Liaojun
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND TRACKING XXXIII, 2022, 12101
  • [26] Sex differences in judgement of facial affect: A multivariate analysis of recognition errors
    Thayer, JF
    Johnsen, BH
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 41 (03) : 243 - 246
  • [27] Reserving judgement on HRT - Response
    Yusuf, S
    Anand, S
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 167 (10) : 1105 - 1105
  • [28] Anandamide mediates cognitive judgement bias in rats
    Kregiel, J.
    Malek, N.
    Popik, P.
    Starowicz, K.
    Rygula, R.
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 101 : 146 - 153
  • [29] Studying affect induced judgement bias in birds
    Kost'al, L'ubor
    Skalna, Zuzana
    Pichova, Katarina
    PHARMACOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2019, 71 (06) : 1310 - 1311
  • [30] RESPONSE TO CRITICISMS OF THE MAJORITY JUDGEMENT
    Balinski, Michel
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2019, 70 (04): : 589 - 610