Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants

被引:155
|
作者
Grandin, Temple [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Slaughter welfare; Cattle; Pigs; Stunning; HALOTHANE-ANESTHETIZED CALVES; TO-SENSIBILITY PROBLEMS; MARKET-WEIGHT PIGS; BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES; SCORING SYSTEM; PORK QUALITY; MEAT QUALITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC RESPONSES; RACTOPAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE; BROILER-CHICKENS;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.022
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The OIE Welfare Standards on slaughter transport, and killing of animals for disease control are basic minimum standards that every country should follow. The OIE, European Union, and many private standards used by commercial industry have an emphasis on animal based outcome standards instead of engineering based standards. Numerical scoring is used by both private industry and some governments to access animal welfare at slaughter plants. Five variables are measured. They are: 1) Percentage of animals effectively stunned on the first attempt, 2) Percentage rendered insensible, 3) Percentage that vocalize (bellow, moo, squeal) during handling and stunning, 4) Percentage that fall during handling, and 5) Percentage moved with an electric goad. Each one of these critical control points measures the outcome of many problems. A good animal welfare auditing system also has standards that prohibit really bad practices such as dragging, dropping, throwing, puntilla, and hoisting live animals before ritual slaughter. On farm and transport problems that can be measured at the slaughter plant are: percentage of lame animals, percentage of thin animals, percentage of dirty animals, percentage with sores, bruises or lesions, death losses, morbidity, and percentage of birds with broken wings and legs. (C) 2010 The American Meat Science Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 65
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Animal Welfare Policies and Human Rights in the Context of Slaughter Procedures
    Bozzo, Giancarlo
    Barrasso, Roberta
    Ferorelli, Davide
    Gassi, Vito
    Russo, Roberto
    Celentano, Francesco Emanuele
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [33] Aspects of animal welfare protection at stunning and slaughter procedures of fish
    Kleingeld, Dirk Willem
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2013, 93 (04): : 188 - 192
  • [34] Acquisition of animal-based welfare measures at slaughter of poultry
    Louton, Helen
    Erhard, Michael
    Woehr, Anna-Caroline
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2018, 98 (11): : 94 - 98
  • [35] The Slaughter of Farmed Animals: Practical Ways of Enhancing Animal Welfare
    Jopp, Erik
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 258 (06): : 604 - 605
  • [36] FARM ANIMAL-WELFARE DURING HANDLING, TRANSPORT, AND SLAUGHTER
    GRANDIN, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 204 (03): : 372 - 377
  • [37] Animal Welfare EFSA-Report on the Slaughter of pregnant Animals
    不详
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2017, 97 (09): : 52 - 53
  • [38] The Slaughter of Farmed Animals: Practical Ways of Enhancing Animal Welfare
    Jopp, Erik
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2021, 82 (05) : 339 - 340
  • [39] Fish slaughter practices in Brazilian aquaculture and their consequences for animal welfare
    Coelho, M. E. G.
    Pedrazzani, A. S.
    Quintiliano, M. H.
    Bolfe, F.
    Molento, C. F. M.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2022, 31 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [40] Slaughter Method Pasture Slaughter permitted by law A Swiss Pioneer Project in Terms of Animal Welfare
    Meili, Eric
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2016, 96 (08): : 28 - 30