Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants

被引:155
|
作者
Grandin, Temple [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Slaughter welfare; Cattle; Pigs; Stunning; HALOTHANE-ANESTHETIZED CALVES; TO-SENSIBILITY PROBLEMS; MARKET-WEIGHT PIGS; BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES; SCORING SYSTEM; PORK QUALITY; MEAT QUALITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC RESPONSES; RACTOPAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE; BROILER-CHICKENS;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.022
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The OIE Welfare Standards on slaughter transport, and killing of animals for disease control are basic minimum standards that every country should follow. The OIE, European Union, and many private standards used by commercial industry have an emphasis on animal based outcome standards instead of engineering based standards. Numerical scoring is used by both private industry and some governments to access animal welfare at slaughter plants. Five variables are measured. They are: 1) Percentage of animals effectively stunned on the first attempt, 2) Percentage rendered insensible, 3) Percentage that vocalize (bellow, moo, squeal) during handling and stunning, 4) Percentage that fall during handling, and 5) Percentage moved with an electric goad. Each one of these critical control points measures the outcome of many problems. A good animal welfare auditing system also has standards that prohibit really bad practices such as dragging, dropping, throwing, puntilla, and hoisting live animals before ritual slaughter. On farm and transport problems that can be measured at the slaughter plant are: percentage of lame animals, percentage of thin animals, percentage of dirty animals, percentage with sores, bruises or lesions, death losses, morbidity, and percentage of birds with broken wings and legs. (C) 2010 The American Meat Science Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 65
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maintenance of good animal welfare standards in beef slaughter plants by use of auditing programs
    Grandin, T
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 226 (03): : 370 - 373
  • [2] Auditing animal welfare and making practical improvements in beef-, pork- and sheep-slaughter plants
    Grandin, T.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2012, 21 : 29 - 34
  • [3] Survey of slaughter plants from an animal welfare standpoint in Eastern Turkey
    Sabuncuoglu, N.
    Coban, O.
    Bayraktar, M.
    Elmali, M.
    Ekici, K.
    Ceylan, Z. G.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2008, 17 (02) : 205 - 206
  • [4] Evaluation of animal welfare in three municipal slaughter plants in southwestern Ecuador
    Guevara-Freire, Deysi
    Luciano, Valle
    Aviles-Esquivel, Diana
    Villarroel, Karen
    Aguagallo, Joan
    [J]. REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIONES VETERINARIAS DEL PERU, 2023, 34 (05):
  • [5] Animal welfare assessment and auditing
    Curtis, S. E.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 : 595 - 595
  • [6] Animal welfare assessment and auditing
    Curtis, S. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 : 595 - 595
  • [7] Animal welfare assessment and auditing
    Curtis, S. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 : 595 - 595
  • [8] The animal welfare slaughter regulation
    Knierim, U
    [J]. DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1996, 103 (02): : 52 - 54
  • [9] Animal welfare at slaughter ritual
    Rogowska-Sobota, Katarzyna A.
    Budny-Walczak, Anna
    Monkiewicz, Jerzy
    Sobota, Marcin
    [J]. MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2016, 72 (02): : 130 - 133
  • [10] Applied animal welfare at slaughter houses
    vonHolleben, K
    [J]. DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1996, 103 (02): : 55 - 58