A cross-country comparison of compensation mechanisms for distributed photovoltaics in the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam

被引:18
|
作者
Junlakarn, Siripha [1 ]
Kittner, Noah [2 ,3 ]
Tongsopit, Sopitsuda [4 ,5 ]
Saelim, Supawan [5 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Energy Res Inst, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Policy Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] USAID Clean Power Asia Implemented Abt Associates, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
Distributed photovoltaics; Southeast Asia; Solar policy; Compensation mechanisms; Equity; FEED-IN TARIFF; SOLAR PV; SELF-CONSUMPTION; POWER; SYSTEMS; PENETRATION; INTEGRATION; ECONOMICS; OPTIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.110820
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Globally, policies designed for high penetration of distributed photovoltaics (DPV) primarily have shifted from mainly encouraging investment through subsidies to addressing equity and stakeholder concerns on retail tariffs and utility revenue impacts. Net metering and feed-in tariffs now serve as the main policy mechanisms to support distributed PV in the U.S. and Europe, although modifications are ongoing to alleviate concerns over consumer inequity and the financial health of utilities. Retail tariff design and utility revenue impacts are now at the forefront of the debate for ASEAN countries formulating new policies and incentives for PV deployment. This paper discusses experiences of DPV development in the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. These countries have ongoing efforts to adjust their DPV programs to match a rapidly dynamic and evolving DPV market and incorporate new technology capabilities such as blockchain-based peer-to-peer solar energy trading platforms. The paper also presents a quantitative analysis of customer economics under various competing compensation mechanisms and analyzes the remaining barriers to DPV market expansion in these three countries. Net billing could achieve more economically equitable policy design for other Southeast Asian countries looking to make solar electricity broadly accessible for all.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Urban ground leases: a cross-country comparison
    Pope, Alan R.
    Young, Martin R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPERTY RESEARCH, 2024, 41 (02) : 126 - 146
  • [32] Tax reforms and investment: A cross-country comparison
    Cummins, JG
    Hassett, KA
    Hubbard, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1996, 62 (1-2) : 237 - 273
  • [33] A CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISON OF CONSUMER EXPENDITURE PATTERNS
    GOLDBERG.AS
    GAMALETS.T
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1968, 36 (5S) : 147 - &
  • [34] CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISON OF CONSUMER EXPENDITURE PATTERNS
    GOLDBERGER, AS
    GAMALETSOS, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1970, 1 (03) : 357 - 399
  • [35] Cross-country spillovers of trade uncertainty and their formation mechanisms
    Wu, Chao
    Zhao, Ke
    Liu, Jinquan
    Zhao, Xiuyi
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 66
  • [36] A cross-country comparison of Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia golf tourism experience: a perceptual experience of Malaysian golfers
    Ali, Ahmad Johanif Mohd
    Hanafiah, Mohd Hafiz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MARKETING & SPONSORSHIP, 2024, 25 (01): : 125 - 141
  • [37] A CROSS-COUNTRY, CROSS-INDUSTRY COMPARISON OF PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
    COSTELLO, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1993, 101 (02) : 207 - 222
  • [38] China's energy inefficiency: A cross-country comparison
    Wei, Chu
    Ni, Jinlan
    Sheng, Manhong
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2011, 48 (03): : 478 - 488
  • [39] Perceptions of perioperative nursing competence: a cross-country comparison
    Brigid M. Gillespie
    Emma B. Harbeck
    Karin Falk-Brynhildsen
    Ulrica Nilsson
    Maria Jaensson
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 17
  • [40] GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN POULTRY INDUSTRIES - A CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISON
    HARLING, KF
    THOMPSON, RL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 67 (02) : 243 - 250