Validity and reliability of the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder self-report scale (ASRS-v1.1) in a clinical sample with eating disorders

被引:14
|
作者
Carlucci, Samantha [1 ]
Ivanova, Iryna [2 ,3 ]
Bissada, Hany [2 ,3 ]
Tasca, Giorgio A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1G 0H9, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1G 0H9, Canada
关键词
Eating disorders; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; ASRS-v1.1; Impulsivity; Inattention; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY-DISORDER; BULIMIA-NERVOSA; PSYCHOMETRIC-PROPERTIES; METHYLPHENIDATE TREATMENT; SYMPTOM CHECKLIST; ANOREXIA-NERVOSA; SUBSTANCE USE; ADHD; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.03.010
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Individuals with eating disorders (EDs) commonly experience comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The shared features of EDs and ADHD, such as inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity, may exacerbate ED symptomatology and pose challenges to treatment. It is important to screen patients with EDs for symptoms of ADHD to optimize their treatment outcomes. However, the psychometrics of common measures of ADHD have not yet been examined within an ED population. An example of such a measure is the ADHD self-report scale (ASRS-v1.1) symptom checklist, which identifies the presence of ADHD symptoms. This study reports a psychometric study of the ASRS-v1.1 in a clinical sample of 500 adults with an ED. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated the ASRS-v1.1 maintained its two-factor structure of inattention and impulsivity/hyperactivity. The item loadings demonstrated path invariance across ED diagnostic groups indicating construct validity. Further, the subscales exhibited good internal consistency and they were significantly correlated with other measures of impulsivity indicating convergent validity. The ED sample had significantly higher mean scores than published non-clinical norms indicating predictive validity, but the ASRS-v1.1 scores were not significantly different among ED diagnostic groups. Results suggest the ASRS-v1.1 is a valid and reliable screening tool for identifying symptoms of ADHD among adults seeking treatment for ED. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The short form adult attention deficit/hyperactivity self-report scale is a useful diagnostic measure
    Garland, Malcolm R.
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2006, 9 (02) : 38 - 38
  • [42] Standardization of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale-v1.1 and the ADHD Self-Report Scale in a Representative German-Speaking Sample
    Morstedt, Beatrice
    Corbisiero, Salvatore
    Stieglitz, Rolf-Dieter
    DIAGNOSTICA, 2016, 62 (04): : 199 - 211
  • [43] Validity and accuracy of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self-Report Scale (ASRS) and the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS) symptom checklists in discriminating between adults with and without ADHD (vol 10, pg 1295, 2020)
    Brevik, Erlend Joramo
    Lundervold, Astri J.
    Haavik, Jan
    Posserud, Maj-Britt
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [44] The World Health Organization Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5
    Ustun, Berk
    Adler, Lenard A.
    Rudin, Cynthia
    Faraone, Stephen V.
    Spencer, Thomas J.
    Berglund, Patricia
    Gruber, Michael J.
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 74 (05) : 520 - 526
  • [45] A pilot study: Use of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Scale in a South African patient population
    Regnart, Judith
    Truter, Ilse
    Zingela, Zukiswa
    Meyer, Anneke
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 25
  • [46] PsyChometric properties of the Japanese version of the Adult Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Self-Report Scale (ASRS-J)and its short scale in accordance with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria
    Takeda, Toshinobu
    Tsuji, Yui
    Kurita, Hiroshi
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2017, 63 : 59 - 66
  • [47] Evaluation of the German Version of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5 as a Screening Tool for Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Primary Care
    Ballmann, Cora
    Koelle, Markus Alexander
    Bekavac-Guenther, Ines
    Wolf, Florian
    Pargent, Florian
    Barzel, Anne
    Philipsen, Alexandra
    Gensichen, Jochen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [48] Construction, validity and reliability, of the screening scale ⟪FASCT⟫ for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults.: (Self-reported and observer versions)
    Almeida Montes, L. G.
    Friederichsen Alonso, A.
    Olivia Hernandez, A.
    Rodriguez Carranza, R.
    de la Pena Olvera, F.
    Cortes Sotres, J.
    ACTAS ESPANOLAS DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2006, 34 (04): : 231 - 238
  • [49] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the wender Utah rating scale for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults
    Öncü, B
    Ölmez, S
    Sentürk, V
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2005, 16 (04) : 252 - 259
  • [50] Adding the missing voice: How self-report of autistic youth self-report on an executive functioning rating scale compares to parent report and that of youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or neurotypical development
    Kenworthy, Lauren
    Verbalis, Alyssa
    Bascom, Julia
    DaVanport, Sharon
    Strang, John F.
    Pugliese, Cara
    Freeman, Andrew
    Jeppsen, Charlotte
    Armour, Anna C.
    Jost, Geneva
    Hardy, Kristina
    Wallace, Gregory L.
    AUTISM, 2022, 26 (02) : 422 - 433