Risk of unintended pregnancy based on intended compared to actual contraceptive use

被引:19
|
作者
Reeves, Matthew F. [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Qiuhong [3 ]
Secura, Gina M. [3 ]
Peipert, Jeffrey F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Abort Federat, Washington, DC USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Clin Res, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
continuation; contraception; injectable contraception; unintended pregnancy; 2002; NATIONAL-SURVEY; DISCONTINUATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.162
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: After initiating a new contraceptive method, the provider has little control of how or whether that method is used. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare unintended pregnancy rates by the initial chosen contraceptive method after counseling to traditional contraceptive effectiveness in the same study population. STUDY DESIGN: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project provided reversible contraception to 9252 women at no cost during 2-3 years of followup. We performed 2 analyses of contraceptive efficacy in this prospective cohort: (1) intent-to-use (ITU), grouping participants based on their chosen method at enrollment; and (2) as-used, categorizing participant time according to the method used. In ITU analysis, switching of methods and method continuation were not considered, as we wanted to assess outcomes based on the method chosen at baseline. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare rates of unintended pregnancy. RESULTS: During 20,017 person-years, we identified 615 unintended pregnancies. In ITU analysis, pregnancy rates were 5.3, 5.5, 2.0, 1.7, and 1.9 per 100 person-years for women initiating oral, injectable, implantable, copper, and hormonal intrauterine contraception (IUC) at baseline, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio for injectable contraception compared to hormonal IUC was 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.3). Delaying initiation of IUC or implantable contraception increased unintended pregnancies by 60% (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.0). In as-used analysis, pregnancy rates were 6.7, 1.6, 0.2, 0.6, and 0.2 per 100 person-years for women using oral, injectable, implantable, copper, and hormonal IUC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although highly effective in the as-used analysis, women initially choosing injectable contraception had pregnancy rates similar to oral contraception and significantly worse than IUC or implantable contraception. Despite switching and discontinuation, women choosing an IUC or implantable contraception at baseline were much less likely to have an unintended pregnancy compared to those selecting other methods.
引用
收藏
页码:71.e1 / 71.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unintended pregnancy and subsequent postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use in Zimbabwe
    Nerissa Nance
    Lauren Ralph
    Nancy Padian
    Frances Cowan
    Raluca Buzdugan
    Angela Mushavi
    Agnes Mahomva
    Sandra I McCoy
    [J]. BMC Women's Health, 18
  • [32] Unintended Pregnancy and Contraceptive Use Among Women in the US Military: A Systematic Literature Review
    Holt, Kelsey
    Grindlay, Kate
    Taskier, Madeline
    Grossman, Daniel
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2011, 176 (09) : 1056 - 1064
  • [33] Unintended pregnancy and subsequent postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use in Zimbabwe
    Nance, Nerissa
    Ralph, Lauren
    Padian, Nancy
    Cowan, Frances
    Buzdugan, Raluca
    Mushavi, Angela
    Mahomva, Agnes
    McCoy, Sandra I.
    [J]. BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 18
  • [34] Factors associated with postpartum contraceptive method use after an unintended pregnancy ending in a birth
    Harrison, E. Young
    Steinberg, J.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 98 (04) : 347 - 347
  • [35] Harmonizing Methods for Estimating the Impact of Contraceptive Use on Unintended Pregnancy, Abortion, and Maternal Health
    Askew, Ian
    Weinberger, Michelle
    Dasgupta, Aisha
    Darroch, Jacqueline
    Smith, Ellen
    Stover, John
    Yahner, Melanie
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2017, 5 (04): : 658 - 667
  • [36] Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review
    Birgisson, Natalia E.
    Zhao, Qiuhong
    Secura, Gina M.
    Madden, Tessa
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2015, 24 (05) : 349 - 353
  • [37] CONTRACEPTIVE PATHS TOWARD THE REDUCTION OF UNINTENDED PREGNANCY AND ABORTION
    WESTOFF, CF
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1988, 20 (01): : 4 - 13
  • [38] Reasons for contraceptive nonuse at first sex and unintended pregnancy
    Iuliano, AD
    Speizer, IS
    Santelli, J
    Kendall, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2006, 30 (01): : 92 - 102
  • [39] VALIDATION OF MEASURES OF CONDOM AND OTHER CONTRACEPTIVE USE AMONG WOMEN AT HIGH-RISK FOR HIV-INFECTION AND UNINTENDED PREGNANCY
    GALAVOTTI, C
    CABRAL, RJ
    LANSKY, A
    GRIMLEY, DM
    RILEY, GE
    PROCHASKA, JO
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 14 (06) : 570 - 578
  • [40] Unintended pregnancy risk and contraceptive use among women 45-50 years old: Massachusetts, 2006, 2008, and 2010
    Godfrey, Emily M.
    Zapata, Lauren B.
    Cox, Carie M.
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    Marchbanks, Polly A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (06)