Risk of unintended pregnancy based on intended compared to actual contraceptive use

被引:19
|
作者
Reeves, Matthew F. [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Qiuhong [3 ]
Secura, Gina M. [3 ]
Peipert, Jeffrey F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Abort Federat, Washington, DC USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Clin Res, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
continuation; contraception; injectable contraception; unintended pregnancy; 2002; NATIONAL-SURVEY; DISCONTINUATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.162
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: After initiating a new contraceptive method, the provider has little control of how or whether that method is used. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare unintended pregnancy rates by the initial chosen contraceptive method after counseling to traditional contraceptive effectiveness in the same study population. STUDY DESIGN: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project provided reversible contraception to 9252 women at no cost during 2-3 years of followup. We performed 2 analyses of contraceptive efficacy in this prospective cohort: (1) intent-to-use (ITU), grouping participants based on their chosen method at enrollment; and (2) as-used, categorizing participant time according to the method used. In ITU analysis, switching of methods and method continuation were not considered, as we wanted to assess outcomes based on the method chosen at baseline. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare rates of unintended pregnancy. RESULTS: During 20,017 person-years, we identified 615 unintended pregnancies. In ITU analysis, pregnancy rates were 5.3, 5.5, 2.0, 1.7, and 1.9 per 100 person-years for women initiating oral, injectable, implantable, copper, and hormonal intrauterine contraception (IUC) at baseline, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio for injectable contraception compared to hormonal IUC was 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.3). Delaying initiation of IUC or implantable contraception increased unintended pregnancies by 60% (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.0). In as-used analysis, pregnancy rates were 6.7, 1.6, 0.2, 0.6, and 0.2 per 100 person-years for women using oral, injectable, implantable, copper, and hormonal IUC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although highly effective in the as-used analysis, women initially choosing injectable contraception had pregnancy rates similar to oral contraception and significantly worse than IUC or implantable contraception. Despite switching and discontinuation, women choosing an IUC or implantable contraception at baseline were much less likely to have an unintended pregnancy compared to those selecting other methods.
引用
收藏
页码:71.e1 / 71.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contraceptive use and risk of unintended pregnancy in California
    Foster, DG
    Bley, J
    Mikanda, J
    Induni, M
    Arons, A
    Baumrind, N
    Darney, PD
    Stewart, F
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 70 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [2] EPIDEMIOLOGY OF UNINTENDED PREGNANCY AND CONTRACEPTIVE USE
    FORREST, JD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (05) : 1485 - 1489
  • [3] Refining assessment of contraceptive use in the past year in relation to risk of unintended pregnancy
    Daniels, Kimberly
    Ahrens, Katherine
    Pazol, Karen
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 102 (02) : 122 - 128
  • [4] Intended and actual use of cosmetics during pregnancy and risk perception by French women
    Marie, Cecile
    Cabut, S.
    Vendittelli, F.
    Sauvant-Rochat, M-P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26 : 47 - 47
  • [5] Contraceptive use at the time of unintended pregnancy: Findings from the Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy Intention and Decisions study
    Coombe, Jacqueline
    Harris, Melissa L.
    Wigginton, Britta
    Lucke, Jayne C.
    Loxton, Deborah
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2016, 45 (11) : 842 - 848
  • [6] Unmet Need for Safe Contraceptive Use Among Hypertensive Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancy
    Panushka, Katherine
    Danvers, Antoinette
    Evans, Thomas
    Gurney, Elizabeth
    Peskin, Melissa
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 : 9S - 10S
  • [7] Contraceptive Features Preferred by Women At High Risk of Unintended Pregnancy
    Lessard, Lauren N.
    Karasek, Deborah
    Ma, Sandi
    Darney, Philip
    Deardorff, Julianna
    Lahiff, Maureen
    Grossman, Dan
    Foster, Diana Greene
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2012, 44 (03) : 194 - 200
  • [8] Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease
    Lindley, Kathryn J.
    Madden, Tessa
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Ludbrook, Philip A.
    Billadello, Joseph J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (02): : 363 - 369
  • [9] Health insurance coverage and prescription contraceptive use among young women at risk for unintended pregnancy
    Neams, Jodi
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 79 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [10] INCREASING EFFECTIVE CONTRACEPTIVE USE AMONG OPIOID-MAINTAINED WOMEN AT RISK FOR UNINTENDED PREGNANCY
    Heil, S.
    Matusiewicz, A.
    Melbostad, H.
    Sigmon, S.
    Meyer, M.
    Higgins, S.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (04) : 403 - 404