Extreme sexual size dimorphism, sexual selection, and the foraging ecology of Montezuma Oropendolas

被引:23
|
作者
Webster, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV, NEUROBIOL & BEHAV SECT, ITHACA, NY 14853 USA
来源
AUK | 1997年 / 114卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/4089276
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Sexual differences in body size usually are considered to be a product of either sexual selection or ecological divergence between the sexes. I tested the predictions of these hypotheses to explain extreme sexual dimorphism in size in a Neotropical blackbird, the Montezuma Oropendola (Psarocolius montezuma). Sexual dimorphism was more pronounced in wing length and relative mass, traits that appear to be important in courtship and competition for mates, than in bill length or tarsus length. Male dominance rank, which is an indicator of mating success, was positively associated with body size (i.e. high-ranking males were larger than low-ranking males). These results suggest that sexual selection acts to increase male body size, and hence contributes to sexual size dimorphism in this species. Differences in foraging behavior and diet also existed between the sexes and were related to sexual size differences. The small size of females allowed them to forage on food resources that were difficult for the larger males to reach (e.g. insects in rolled leaves at the ends of branches). Females, though, did not appear to be restricted from those resources exploited by males (primarily epiphytal bromeliads). Although it was not possible to reject the ecological-divergence hypothesis, my results suggest that sexual foraging differences are a consequence rather than a cause of sexual dimorphism in size in this species.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 580
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extreme sexual dimorphism in Green Woodhoopoe (Phoeniculus purpureus) bill length:: A case of sexual selection?
    Radford, AN
    Du Plessis, MA
    [J]. AUK, 2004, 121 (01): : 178 - 183
  • [32] Insect choice and floral size dimorphism: Sexual selection or natural selection?
    Abraham, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 2005, 18 (06) : 743 - 756
  • [33] Insect Choice and Floral Size Dimorphism: Sexual Selection or Natural Selection?
    Joseph N. Abraham
    [J]. Journal of Insect Behavior, 2005, 18 : 743 - 756
  • [34] Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism
    Schulte-Hostedde, AI
    Millar, JS
    Gibbs, HL
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 15 (02) : 351 - 356
  • [35] Can sexual dimorphism in skeletal size be used to assess sexual dimorphism in body size?
    Ruff, C. B.
    McHenry, H. M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2004, : 171 - 171
  • [36] The ecology of sexual dimorphism in size and shape of the freshwater blenny Salaria fluviatilis
    Laporte, Martin
    Berrebi, Patrick
    Claude, Julien
    Vinyoles, Dolors
    Pou-Rovira, Quim
    Raymond, Jean-Claude
    Magnan, Pierre
    [J]. CURRENT ZOOLOGY, 2018, 64 (02) : 183 - 191
  • [37] SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY IN RELATION TO MATING SYSTEM IN WADERS
    SAETHER, BE
    KALAS, JA
    LOFALDLI, L
    ANDERSEN, R
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1986, 28 (03) : 273 - 284
  • [38] Role of fecundity selection on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals
    Cassini, Marcelo H.
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 128 : 1 - 4
  • [39] Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity
    Reeve, JP
    Fairbairn, DJ
    [J]. HEREDITY, 1999, 83 (6) : 697 - 706
  • [40] Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity
    Jeff P Reeve
    Daphne J Fairbairn
    [J]. Heredity, 1999, 83 : 697 - 706