Extreme sexual size dimorphism, sexual selection, and the foraging ecology of Montezuma Oropendolas

被引:23
|
作者
Webster, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV, NEUROBIOL & BEHAV SECT, ITHACA, NY 14853 USA
来源
AUK | 1997年 / 114卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/4089276
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Sexual differences in body size usually are considered to be a product of either sexual selection or ecological divergence between the sexes. I tested the predictions of these hypotheses to explain extreme sexual dimorphism in size in a Neotropical blackbird, the Montezuma Oropendola (Psarocolius montezuma). Sexual dimorphism was more pronounced in wing length and relative mass, traits that appear to be important in courtship and competition for mates, than in bill length or tarsus length. Male dominance rank, which is an indicator of mating success, was positively associated with body size (i.e. high-ranking males were larger than low-ranking males). These results suggest that sexual selection acts to increase male body size, and hence contributes to sexual size dimorphism in this species. Differences in foraging behavior and diet also existed between the sexes and were related to sexual size differences. The small size of females allowed them to forage on food resources that were difficult for the larger males to reach (e.g. insects in rolled leaves at the ends of branches). Females, though, did not appear to be restricted from those resources exploited by males (primarily epiphytal bromeliads). Although it was not possible to reject the ecological-divergence hypothesis, my results suggest that sexual foraging differences are a consequence rather than a cause of sexual dimorphism in size in this species.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 580
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The influence of sexual selection and ecological constraints on an extreme sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid
    Schütz, D
    Taborsky, M
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2005, 70 : 539 - 549
  • [2] Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in primates
    Cassini, Marcelo H.
    [J]. MAMMAL REVIEW, 2020, 50 (03) : 231 - 239
  • [3] Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in artiodactyls
    Cassini, Marcelo H.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 31 (03) : 792 - 797
  • [4] Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in animals
    Janicke, Tim
    Fromonteil, Salome
    [J]. BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2021, 17 (09)
  • [5] DISENTANGLING THE CONTRIBUTION OF SEXUAL SELECTION AND ECOLOGY TO THE EVOLUTION OF SIZE DIMORPHISM IN PINNIPEDS
    Krueger, Oliver
    Wolf, Jochen B. W.
    Jonker, Rudy M.
    Hoffman, Joseph I.
    Trillmich, Fritz
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2014, 68 (05) : 1485 - 1496
  • [6] SEXUAL SELECTION, SIZE DIMORPHISM AND A FALLACY
    GREENWOOD, PJ
    ADAMS, J
    [J]. OIKOS, 1987, 48 (01) : 106 - 108
  • [7] Paternity, group size, sexual selection, and sexual dimorphism in primates
    Plavcan, J. Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2022, 177 : 144 - 145
  • [8] SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND SEXUAL SELECTION IN TURTLES (ORDER TESTUDINES)
    BERRY, JF
    SHINE, R
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1980, 44 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [9] Phylogenetic analyses of sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds
    Patrik Lindenfors
    Birgitta S. Tullberg
    Martin Biuw
    [J]. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2002, 52 : 188 - 193
  • [10] Sexual size dimorphism and the strength of sexual selection in mammals and birds
    Soulsbury, Carl D.
    Kervinen, Matti
    Lebigre, Christophe
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (01) : 63 - 76