Susceptibility of ectomycorrhizal fungi to soil heating

被引:56
|
作者
Kipfer, Tabea [1 ,2 ]
Egli, Simon [1 ]
Ghazoul, Jaboury [2 ]
Moser, Barbara [1 ]
Wohlgemuth, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Inst Terr Ecosyst, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Cenococcum geophilum; Ectomycorrhizal fungi; Fire disturbance; Heat; Pinus sylvestris L; Rhizopogon roseolus; RESISTANT PROPAGULES; PINUS-MURICATA; SIMULATED FIRE; FOREST; COMMUNITIES; IDENTIFICATION; MYCORRHIZAE; PONDEROSA; POSTFIRE; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.funbio.2010.03.008
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi are an important biotic factor for successful tree recruitment because they enhance plant growth and alleviate drought stress of their hosts. Thus, EcM propagules are expected to be a key factor for forest regeneration after major disturbance events such as stand-replacing forest fires. Yet the susceptibility of soil-borne EcM fungi to heat is unclear. In this study, we investigated the heat tolerance of EcM fungi of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L., Pinaceae). Soil samples of three soil depths were heated to the temperature of 45, 60 and 70 degrees C, respectively, and surviving EcM fungi were assessed by a bioassay using Scots pine as an experimental host plant. EcM species were identified by a combination of morphotyping and sequencing of the ITS region. We found that mean number of species per sample was reduced by the 60 and 70 degrees C treatment, but not by the 45 degrees C treatment. Species composition changed due to heat. While some EcM fungi species did not survive heating, the majority of species was also found in the heated samples. The most frequent species in the heat treatment were Rhizopogon roseolus, Cenococcum geophilum and several unidentified species. (C) 2010 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 472
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ectomycorrhizal fungi and their enzymes in soils: is there enough evidence for their role as facultative soil saprotrophs?
    Baldrian, Petr
    OECOLOGIA, 2009, 161 (04) : 657 - 660
  • [32] Co-invasive ectomycorrhizal fungi alter native soil fungal communities
    Mujic, Alija Bajro
    Policelli, Nahuel
    Nunez, Martin A.
    Truong, Camille
    Smith, Matthew E.
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2023, 484 (1-2) : 547 - 567
  • [33] Ectomycorrhizal fungi alter soil food webs and the functional potential of bacterial communities
    Berrios, Louis
    Bogar, Glade D.
    Bogar, Laura M.
    Venturini, Andressa M.
    Willing, Claire E.
    Del Rio, Anastacia
    Ansell, T. Bertie
    Zemaitis, Kevin
    Velickovic, Marija
    Velickovic, Dusan
    Pellitier, Peter T.
    Yeam, Jay
    Hutchinson, Chelsea
    Bloodsworth, Kent
    Lipton, Mary S.
    Peay, Kabir G.
    MSYSTEMS, 2024, 9 (06)
  • [34] Ectomycorrhizal fungi introduced with exotic pine plantations induce soil carbon depletion
    Chapela, IH
    Osher, LJ
    Horton, TR
    Henn, MR
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 33 (12-13): : 1733 - 1740
  • [35] Fertilization alters nitrogen isotopes and concentrations in ectomycorrhizal fungi and soil in pine forests
    Hobbie, Erik A.
    Chen, Janet
    Hasselquist, Niles J.
    FUNGAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 39 : 267 - 275
  • [36] Field Reduction of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Has Cascading Effects on Soil Microbial Communities and Reduces the Abundance of Ectomycorrhizal Symbiotic Bacteria
    Berrios, Louis
    Peay, Kabir G.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2025, 34 (01)
  • [37] An overview of Cistus ectomycorrhizal fungi
    Comandini, O.
    Contu, M.
    Rinaldi, A. C.
    MYCORRHIZA, 2006, 16 (06) : 381 - 395
  • [38] DECLINE OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN EUROPE
    ARNOLDS, E
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 35 (2-3) : 209 - 244
  • [39] Storage of ectomycorrhizal fungi by freezing
    Corbery, Y
    LeTacon, F
    ANNALES DES SCIENCES FORESTIERES, 1997, 54 (02): : 211 - 217
  • [40] CYTOKININ PRODUCTION BY ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
    NG, PP
    COLE, ALJ
    JAMESON, PE
    MCWHA, JA
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1982, 91 (01) : 57 - 62