Fluticasone propionate powder administered through Diskhaler versus triamcinolone acetonide aerosol administered through metered-dose inhaler in patients with persistent asthma

被引:45
|
作者
Condemi, JJ
Chervinsky, P
Goldstein, MF
Ford, LB
Berger, WE
Ayars, GH
Rogenes, PR
Edwards, L
Pepsin, PJ
机构
[1] NEW ENGLAND RES CTR INC, N DARTMOUTH, MA USA
[2] ASTHMA CTR, FORKED RIVER, NJ USA
[3] CTR ASTHMA & ALLERGY, PAPILLION, NE USA
[4] SO CALIF RES CTR, MISSION VIEJO, CA USA
[5] GLAXO WELLCOME INC, RES TRIANGLE PK, NC 27709 USA
关键词
inhaled corticosteroid; asthma; fluticasone propionate; triamcinolone acetonide; randomized controlled trial;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-6749(97)70137-4
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Attempts to delineate efficacy and safety differences among inhaled corticosteroids have been difficult because of the lack of well-controlled, comparative studies re ported in the medical literature. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was conducted in 24 outpatient centers. A total of 291 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma (FEV, between 50% and 80% of predicted value), who had previously received maintenance therapy with beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide, were switched to treatment with fluticasone propionate powder (250 mu g twice daily), triamcinolone acetonide aerosol (200 mu g four times daily), or placebo for 24 weeks. Results: Mean increase in FEV, from baseline to end point was significantly (p = 0.009) greater in patients switched to treatment with fluticasone compared with patients switched to treatment with triamcinolone (0.27 L and 0.07 L, respectively). At end point, mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow from baseline was 21 L/min with fluticasone compared with mean decreases of 6 L/min and 28 L/min with triamcinolone and placebo, respectively (p < 0.001 vs triamcinolone and placebo). Supplemental rescue albuterol use decreased by 30% from baseline with fluticasone (p < 0.05 vs triamcinolone and placebo) compared,vith triamcinolone (6%) or placebo (increased by 50%). The percentage of patients withdrawn from the study because they met predefined lack-of-efficacy criteria was higher with placebo (60%) and triamcinolone (27%) than with fluticasone (17%), Incidence of adverse events and low morning plasma cortisol concentrations were similar across treatment groups except for oral candidiasis (p = 0.035, fluticasone vs placebo). Conclusion: Fluticasone propionate powder twice daily (500 mu g/day) was superior in efficacy to triamcinolone acetonide aerosol four times daily (800 mu g/day) in patients with persistent asthma.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 474
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条