The impact of air pollutant deposition on solar energy system efficiency: An approach to estimate PV soiling effects with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model

被引:21
|
作者
Zhou, Luxi [1 ,2 ]
Schwede, Donna B. [1 ]
Appel, K. Wyat [1 ]
Mangiante, Michael J. [1 ,4 ]
Wong, David C. [1 ]
Napelenok, Sergey L. [1 ]
Whung, Pai-Yei [1 ]
Zhang, Banglin [3 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] Natl Acad Sci Engn & Med, Washington, DC 20001 USA
[3] CMA, Inst Trop & Marine Meteorol, Gtrangdong Prov Key Lab Reg Numer Weather Predict, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Environm Resource Management, Washington, DC 20006 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
Air quality; Deposition; Soiling effect; Solar PV; Air quality modeling; DUST; COVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.194
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Deposition and accumulation of aerosol particles on photovoltaics (PV) panels, which is commonly referred to as "soiling of PV panels," impacts the performance of the PV energy system. It is desirable to estimate the soiling effect at different locations and times for modeling the PV system performance and devising cost-effective mitigation. This study presents an approach to estimate the soiling effect by utilizing particulate matter (PM) dry deposition estimates from air quality model simulations. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system used in this study was developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) for air quality assessments, rule-making, and research. Three deposition estimates based on different surface roughness length parameters assumed in CMAQ were used to illustrate the soling effect in different land-use types. The results were analyzed for three locations in the U.S. for year 2011. One urban and one suburban location in Colorado were selected because there have been field measurements of particle deposition on solar panels and analysis on the consequent soiling effect performed at these locations. The third location is a coastal city in Texas, the City of Brownsville. These three locations have distinct ambient environments. CMAQ underestimates particle deposition by 40% to 80% when compared to the field measurements at the two sites in Colorado due to the underestimations in both the ambient PM10 concentration and deposition velocity. The estimated panel transmittance sensitivity due to the deposited particles is higher than the sensitivity obtained from the measurements in Colorado. The final soiling effect, which is transmittance loss, is estimated as 3.17 +/- 4.20% for the Texas site, 0.45 +/- 0.33%, and 0.31 +/- 0.25% for the Colorado sites. Although the numbers are lower compared to the measurements in Colorado, the results are comparable with the soiling effects observed in U.S. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 465
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 4.5: Sensitivities impacting model performance Part I - Ozone
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Gilliland, Alice B.
    Sarwar, Golam
    Gilliam, Robert C.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (40) : 9603 - 9615
  • [32] A multi-resolution assessment of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v4.7 wet deposition estimates for 2002-2006
    Appel, K. W.
    Foley, K. M.
    Bash, J. O.
    Pinder, R. W.
    Dennis, R. L.
    Allen, D. J.
    Pickering, K.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 4 (02) : 357 - 371
  • [33] First results from operational testing of the US EPA models 3/community multiscale model for air quality (CMAQ)
    Arnold, JR
    Dennis, RL
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XIV, 2001, : 651 - 658
  • [34] Modeling natural emissions in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model - Part 2: Modifications for simulating natural emissions
    Mueller, S. F.
    Mao, Q.
    Mallard, J. W.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2011, 11 (01) : 293 - 320
  • [35] Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to hemispheric scales: overview of process considerations and initial applications
    Mathur, Rohit
    Xing, Jia
    Gilliam, Robert
    Sarwar, Golam
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Pleim, Jonathan
    Pouliot, George
    Roselle, Shawn
    Spero, Tanya L.
    Wong, David C.
    Young, Jeffrey
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (20) : 12449 - 12474
  • [36] Simulating emission and chemical evolution of coarse sea-salt particles in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model
    Kelly, J. T.
    Bhave, P. V.
    Nolte, C. G.
    Shankar, U.
    Foley, K. M.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 3 (01) : 257 - 273
  • [37] Modeling natural emissions in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model-I: building an emissions data base
    Smith, S. N.
    Mueller, S. F.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (10) : 4931 - 4952
  • [38] Evaluation of the community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model version 4.5: Sensitivities impacting model performance; Part II - particulate matter
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Bhave, Prakash V.
    Gilliland, Alice B.
    Sarwar, Golam
    Roselle, Shawn J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (24) : 6057 - 6066
  • [39] The aerosol distribution in Europe derived with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model: comparison to near surface in situ and sunphotometer measurements
    Matthias, V.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (17) : 5077 - 5097
  • [40] The Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.3.2
    Murphy, Benjamin N.
    Nolte, Christopher G.
    Sidi, Fahim
    Bash, Jesse O.
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Jang, Carey
    Kang, Daiwen
    Kelly, James
    Mathur, Rohit
    Napelenok, Sergey
    Pouliot, George
    Pye, Havala O. T.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 14 (06) : 3407 - 3420