The impact of air pollutant deposition on solar energy system efficiency: An approach to estimate PV soiling effects with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model

被引:21
|
作者
Zhou, Luxi [1 ,2 ]
Schwede, Donna B. [1 ]
Appel, K. Wyat [1 ]
Mangiante, Michael J. [1 ,4 ]
Wong, David C. [1 ]
Napelenok, Sergey L. [1 ]
Whung, Pai-Yei [1 ]
Zhang, Banglin [3 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] Natl Acad Sci Engn & Med, Washington, DC 20001 USA
[3] CMA, Inst Trop & Marine Meteorol, Gtrangdong Prov Key Lab Reg Numer Weather Predict, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Environm Resource Management, Washington, DC 20006 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
Air quality; Deposition; Soiling effect; Solar PV; Air quality modeling; DUST; COVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.194
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Deposition and accumulation of aerosol particles on photovoltaics (PV) panels, which is commonly referred to as "soiling of PV panels," impacts the performance of the PV energy system. It is desirable to estimate the soiling effect at different locations and times for modeling the PV system performance and devising cost-effective mitigation. This study presents an approach to estimate the soiling effect by utilizing particulate matter (PM) dry deposition estimates from air quality model simulations. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system used in this study was developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) for air quality assessments, rule-making, and research. Three deposition estimates based on different surface roughness length parameters assumed in CMAQ were used to illustrate the soling effect in different land-use types. The results were analyzed for three locations in the U.S. for year 2011. One urban and one suburban location in Colorado were selected because there have been field measurements of particle deposition on solar panels and analysis on the consequent soiling effect performed at these locations. The third location is a coastal city in Texas, the City of Brownsville. These three locations have distinct ambient environments. CMAQ underestimates particle deposition by 40% to 80% when compared to the field measurements at the two sites in Colorado due to the underestimations in both the ambient PM10 concentration and deposition velocity. The estimated panel transmittance sensitivity due to the deposited particles is higher than the sensitivity obtained from the measurements in Colorado. The final soiling effect, which is transmittance loss, is estimated as 3.17 +/- 4.20% for the Texas site, 0.45 +/- 0.33%, and 0.31 +/- 0.25% for the Colorado sites. Although the numbers are lower compared to the measurements in Colorado, the results are comparable with the soiling effects observed in U.S. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 465
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Linking the Eta Model with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to build a national air quality forecasting system
    Otte, TL
    Pouliot, G
    Pleim, JE
    Young, JO
    Schere, KL
    Wong, DC
    Lee, PCS
    Tsidulko, M
    McQueen, JT
    Davidson, P
    Mathur, R
    Chuang, HY
    DiMego, G
    Seaman, NL
    WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2005, 20 (03) : 367 - 384
  • [2] The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Bash, Jesse O.
    Fahey, Kathleen M.
    Foley, Kristen M.
    Gilliam, Robert C.
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Hutzell, William T.
    Kang, Daiwen
    Mathur, Rohit
    Murphy, Benjamin N.
    Napelenok, Sergey L.
    Nolte, Christopher G.
    Pleim, Jonathan E.
    Pouliot, George A.
    Pye, Havala O. T.
    Ran, Limei
    Roselle, Shawn J.
    Sarwar, Golam
    Schwede, Donna B.
    Sidi, Fahim, I
    Spero, Tanya L.
    Wong, David C.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 14 (05) : 2867 - 2897
  • [3] Linking the ETA model with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system: Ozone boundary conditions
    Lee, Pius C.
    Pleim, Jonathan E.
    Mathur, Rohit
    McQueen, Jeffery T.
    Tsidulko, Marina
    DiMego, Geoff
    Iredell, Mark
    Otte, Tanya L.
    Pouliot, Georae
    Young, Jeffrey O.
    Wong, David
    Kang, Daiwen
    Hart, Mary
    Schere, Kenneth L.
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATIONS XVII, 2007, 17 : 379 - +
  • [4] Overview and Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Version 5.2
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Napelenok, Sergey
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Pouliot, George
    Foley, Kristen M.
    Roselle, Shawn J.
    Pleim, Jonathan E.
    Bash, Jesse
    Pye, Havala O. T.
    Heath, Nicholas
    Murphy, Benjamin
    Mathur, Rohit
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XXV, 2018, : 69 - 73
  • [5] Incremental testing of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7
    Foley, K. M.
    Roselle, S. J.
    Appel, K. W.
    Bhave, P. V.
    Pleim, J. E.
    Otte, T. L.
    Mathur, R.
    Sarwar, G.
    Young, J. O.
    Gilliam, R. C.
    Nolte, C. G.
    Kelly, J. T.
    Gilliland, A. B.
    Bash, J. O.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 3 (01) : 205 - 226
  • [6] Description of the models-3 community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system
    Byun, DW
    Young, J
    Gipson, G
    Godowitch, J
    Binkowski, F
    Roselle, S
    Benjey, B
    Pleim, J
    Ching, J
    Novak, J
    Coats, C
    Odman, T
    Hanna, A
    Alapaty, K
    Mathur, R
    McHenry, J
    Shankar, U
    Fine, S
    Xiu, AJ
    Jang, C
    10TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON THE APPLICATIONS OF AIR POLLUTION METEOROLOGY WITH THE A&WMA, 1998, : 264 - 268
  • [7] Beta test of Models-3 with Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model
    LeDuc, S
    10TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON THE APPLICATIONS OF AIR POLLUTION METEOROLOGY WITH THE A&WMA, 1998, : 274 - 275
  • [8] Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Napelenok, Sergey L.
    Foley, Kristen M.
    Pye, Havala O. T.
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Luecken, Deborah J.
    Bash, Jesse O.
    Roselle, Shawn J.
    Pleim, Jonathan E.
    Foroutan, Hosein
    Hutzell, William T.
    Pouliot, George A.
    Sarwar, Golam
    Fahey, Kathleen M.
    Gantt, Brett
    Gilliam, Robert C.
    Heath, Nicholas K.
    Kang, Daiwen
    Mathur, Rohit
    Schwede, Donna B.
    Spero, Tanya L.
    Wong, David C.
    Young, Jeffrey O.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 10 (04) : 1703 - 1732
  • [9] The importance of spatial resolutions of Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models on health impact assessment
    Jiang, Xiangyu
    Yoo, Eun-hye
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 627 : 1528 - 1543
  • [10] Investigation of the Community Multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model representation of the Climate Penalty Factor (CPF)
    Hembeck, Linda
    Dickerson, Russell R.
    Canty, Timothy P.
    Allen, Dale J.
    Salawitch, Ross J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 283