Investigation on the Centre of Pressure Migration for Different Wing Configurations

被引:0
|
作者
Pua'at, Afifi A. [1 ]
Zhahir, Amzari [1 ]
Hamid, Mohd Faisal Abdul [1 ]
Gires, Ezanee [1 ]
Ahmad, Mohamed Tarmizi [2 ]
Hassan, Aziz [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Engn, Dept Aerosp Engn, Upm Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Pertahanan Nasl Malaysia, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
[3] Univ Selangor, Fac Engn & Life Sci, Bestari Jaya Campus,Jalan Timur Tambahan, Bestari Jaya 45600, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
关键词
Wing-in-ground-effect; Aerodynamics; Center of pressure; Wing configurations; WIG craft;
D O I
10.6125/JoAAA.202209_54(3).03
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A wing-in-ground effect (WIG) craft experiences longitudinal instability due to its center of pressure (COP) location migrating when in transition from in-ground-effect (IGE) to out-of-ground effect (OGE) zone. The study on this subject has always been a grey area and only very limited published research is available. As an attempt to further support the development of WIG crafts, this study investigates COP migration for different wing configurations using CFD software. It is taken that a satisfying configuration must have a minimal COP migration in term of the vertical height as percentage of chord (HC) and angle of attack (AOA) increment. The significant severances of ground effect depend on the total COP migration from 0 degrees to 10 degrees. With this notion, the cases of rectangular and inverse delta wing configurations have been simulated and analyzed using two different airfoil profiles: Clark Y and DHMTU. The COP for each configuration is plotted and based on the analysis results, it is found the COP migration is relatively higher for the rectangular wing configurations that the inverse delta wing configurations. The lowest COP migration is for the inverse delta wing with DHMTU airfoil while the highest migration is for the rectangular wing with DHMTU airfoil.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 271
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-Pressure Capturing Wing Configurations
    Cui, Kai
    Li, Guang-Li
    Xiao, Yao
    Xu, Ying-Zhou
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (06) : 1909 - 1919
  • [2] The effects of different wing configurations on missile aerodynamics
    Sumnu, Ahmet
    Guzelbey, Ibrahim Halil
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 10 (01): : 1260 - 1271
  • [3] The trailing vortices generated by a reverse delta wing with different wing configurations
    Lee, T.
    He, S. M.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 82-83 : 378 - 393
  • [4] Numerical Investigation on Pressure Fluctuations for Different Configurations of Vaned Diffuser Pumps
    Feng, Jianjun
    Benra, Friedrich-Karl
    Dohmen, Hans Josef
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROTATING MACHINERY, 2007, 2007
  • [5] Experimental investigation of pressure fluctuation and cavitation for a centrifugal pump with different impeller configurations
    Yao, Zhifeng
    Lu, Li
    Gao, Zhongxin
    Deng, Jie
    Wang, Fujun
    Shuili Xuebao/Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46 (12): : 1444 - 1452
  • [6] Unsteady Pressure Measurements in Wing-With-Store Configurations.
    Destuynder, Roger
    AGARD Report, 1976, (636): : 30 - 37
  • [7] Experimental investigation of wing rock of slender wings and aircraft configurations
    (Publ by Springer-Verlag New York, Secaucus, NJ, USA):
  • [8] A Comparative Investigation on Performance of Fiber Bragg Grating Soil Pressure Sensors With Different Configurations
    Li, Qiang
    Liu, Yunming
    Hong, Chengyu
    Xiong, Li
    Guo, Yongxing
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (22) : 27397 - 27405
  • [9] Numerical investigation of a HPT with different rotor tip configurations in terms of pressure ratio and efficiency
    da Silva, Lucilene Moraes
    Tomita, Jesuino Takachi
    Bringhenti, Cleverson
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 63 : 33 - 40
  • [10] Experimental investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of generic fan-in-wing configurations
    Thouault, N.
    Breitsamter, C.
    Adams, N. A.
    Gologan, C.
    Seifert, J.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 113 (1139): : 9 - 20