The effects of different wing configurations on missile aerodynamics

被引:0
|
作者
Sumnu, Ahmet [1 ]
Guzelbey, Ibrahim Halil [2 ]
机构
[1] Iskenderun Tech Univ, Dept Aviat & Aerosp Engn, TR-31200 Hatay, Turkiye
[2] Hasan Kalyoncu Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-27000 Gaziantep, Turkiye
来源
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ENGINEERING | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Missile Aerodynamics; Turbulence Model; Missile Wing Configuration; CFD; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; PROJECTILE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In the present study, missile aerodynamic analysis is performed using different wing configurations at subsonic and transonic speeds. The wing is critical component in point of aerodynamic efficiency for a missile that speed is especially closer to transonic level because of flow separation. Flow on the wings may adversely effect tailfins of missile at high speed since it may cause vortex generation and flow disturbances. There are few studies that investigate the missile wing using different configurations at critical speeds when examined the previous studies. Therefore, in this study, three different wing configurations are investigated and aerodynamic performance is compared with each other at 0.7 and 0.9 Mach numbers and 5(degrees) angle of attack (AoA). In beginning of this study, missile model with only tailfins is selected from previous study that contains experimental data. Because the experimental data for the selected missile model are available at supersonic speeds, the aerodynamic analysis to verify the solutions is carried out at supersonic speeds. After wing is mounted to the selected missile, aerodynamic analysis is carried out using three different wing configurations that are Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered wings. Lift to drag ratio (C-L/C-D) is calculated to compare wing configurations and it is concluded that Tapered Leading Edge wing configuration shows higher performance then other wing configurations. C-L/C-D values are 2.327, 2.306, 2.303 at 0.7 Mach number and 2.45, 2.429, 2.423 at 0.9 Mach number for Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively. When the results are compared each other, C-L/C-D values at 0.9 Mach number is higher about % 5.28, %5.33 and %5.21 than the C-L/C-D values at 0.7 Mach number for missile with Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1260 / 1271
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THEORETICAL AERODYNAMICS OF OVER-WING-BLOWING CONFIGURATIONS
    LAN, CE
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1977, 14 (06): : 517 - 518
  • [2] Structural and Aerodynamics Studies on Various Wing Configurations for Morphing
    Kumar, D.
    Ali, S. Faruque
    Arockiarajan, A.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (01): : 498 - 503
  • [3] Effects of wing planforms on aerodynamics of MAV
    Fluid Mechanics Institute, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China
    Kongqi Donglixue Xuebao, 2007, 4 (474-478+494): : 474 - 478
  • [4] Blockage Effects on the Aerodynamics of a Pitching Wing
    Lian, Yongsheng
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2010, 48 (12) : 2731 - 2738
  • [5] Scale effects on wing rock aerodynamics
    Beyers, Martin E.
    Ericsson, Lars E.
    Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, 2009, 55 (03): : 145 - 161
  • [6] NUMERICAL CALCULATION OF NONLINEAR AERODYNAMICS OF WING-BODY CONFIGURATIONS.
    Rusak, Z.
    Wasserstrom, E.
    Seginer, A.
    1600, (21):
  • [7] Experimental study of the aerodynamics of a wing with various configurations of wingtip triangular extension
    Popov S.A.
    Djahid G.
    Kuznetsov A.V.
    Russian Aeronautics (Iz VUZ), 2016, 59 (3) : 376 - 380
  • [8] ASYMMETRIC VORTEX EFFECTS ON MISSILE CONFIGURATIONS
    FIDLER, JE
    BATEMAN, MC
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1975, 12 (11) : 674 - 681
  • [9] NONLINEARITIES IN MISSILE AERODYNAMICS
    NIELSEN, JN
    ASTRONAUTICS & AERONAUTICS, 1978, 16 (11): : B38 - B38
  • [10] VISCOUS EFFECTS ON MISSILE AERODYNAMICS AT LOW ANGLES OF ATTACK
    ERICSSON, LE
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1981, 18 (05) : 401 - 405