The effects of different wing configurations on missile aerodynamics

被引:0
|
作者
Sumnu, Ahmet [1 ]
Guzelbey, Ibrahim Halil [2 ]
机构
[1] Iskenderun Tech Univ, Dept Aviat & Aerosp Engn, TR-31200 Hatay, Turkiye
[2] Hasan Kalyoncu Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-27000 Gaziantep, Turkiye
来源
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ENGINEERING | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Missile Aerodynamics; Turbulence Model; Missile Wing Configuration; CFD; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; PROJECTILE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In the present study, missile aerodynamic analysis is performed using different wing configurations at subsonic and transonic speeds. The wing is critical component in point of aerodynamic efficiency for a missile that speed is especially closer to transonic level because of flow separation. Flow on the wings may adversely effect tailfins of missile at high speed since it may cause vortex generation and flow disturbances. There are few studies that investigate the missile wing using different configurations at critical speeds when examined the previous studies. Therefore, in this study, three different wing configurations are investigated and aerodynamic performance is compared with each other at 0.7 and 0.9 Mach numbers and 5(degrees) angle of attack (AoA). In beginning of this study, missile model with only tailfins is selected from previous study that contains experimental data. Because the experimental data for the selected missile model are available at supersonic speeds, the aerodynamic analysis to verify the solutions is carried out at supersonic speeds. After wing is mounted to the selected missile, aerodynamic analysis is carried out using three different wing configurations that are Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered wings. Lift to drag ratio (C-L/C-D) is calculated to compare wing configurations and it is concluded that Tapered Leading Edge wing configuration shows higher performance then other wing configurations. C-L/C-D values are 2.327, 2.306, 2.303 at 0.7 Mach number and 2.45, 2.429, 2.423 at 0.9 Mach number for Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively. When the results are compared each other, C-L/C-D values at 0.9 Mach number is higher about % 5.28, %5.33 and %5.21 than the C-L/C-D values at 0.7 Mach number for missile with Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1260 / 1271
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Flapping Wing Kinematics on Hovering and Forward Flight Aerodynamics
    Nagai, Hiroto
    Isogai, Koji
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2011, 49 (08) : 1750 - 1762
  • [42] MISSILE AERODYNAMICS - PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE
    NIELSEN, JN
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1980, 17 (03) : 165 - 176
  • [43] Unstructured Euler solutions for missile aerodynamics
    Oktay, E
    Alemdaroglu, N
    Tarhan, E
    Champigny, P
    d'Espiney, P
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 4 (07) : 453 - 461
  • [44] The aerodynamics of an actively twisted wing
    Sonnenmeier, James R.
    Onipede, Oladipo, Jr.
    Detar, Andrew J.
    Myers, Heather L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME AEROSPACE DIVISION, 2005, : 277 - 284
  • [45] AERODYNAMICS OF WING TIP SAILS
    Al-Atabi, Mushtak
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 1 (01) : 89 - 98
  • [46] Wing aerodynamics and the science of compromise
    Jupp, J.
    Aeronautical Journal, 2002, 105 (1053): : 633 - 641
  • [47] AERODYNAMICS OF LONG PTEROSAUR WING
    STEIN, RS
    SCIENCE, 1976, 191 (4230) : 898 - 899
  • [48] Aerodynamics of an adaptive wing for MAVs
    Liu, Xuan
    Zhu, Rong
    Liu, Jingwei
    Zhou, Zhaoying
    Ye, Xiongying
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2008, 48 (05): : 789 - 791
  • [49] Racecar Front Wing Aerodynamics
    Mokhtar, Wael A.
    Lane, Jonathan
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PASSENGER CARS-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2009, 1 (01): : 1392 - 1403
  • [50] Aerodynamics of a Wing with a Wingtip Flapper
    Zhao, Longfei
    Shkarayev, Sergey
    Su, Erlong
    FLUIDS, 2018, 3 (02):