Mental health inequalities in 9 former Soviet Union countries: Evidence from the previous decade

被引:6
|
作者
Goryakin, Yevgeniy [1 ]
Suhrcke, Marc [2 ]
Roberts, Bayard [3 ]
McKee, Martin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, European Ctr Hlth Soc Transit, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London WC1H 9SH, England
关键词
Eastern Europe and Central Asia; Health inequalities; Mental health; Standardisation; Transitional economies; Former Soviet Union; Socioeconomic inequalities; SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; WIDENING INEQUALITIES; MORTALITY; RUSSIA; DETERMINANTS; DEPRESSION; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.021
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In the previous two decades, countries of the former Soviet Union underwent substantive economic and social changes. While there has been some limited evidence on the relationship between socioeconomic well-being and mental health in the developing and transitional economies, the evidence on economic inequalities in mental health has so far been scarce. In this paper, we analyse two unique datasets collected in 2001 (N = 18,428) and in 2010 (N = 17,998) containing data on 9 countries of the former Soviet Union, exploring how mental health inequalities have changed between 2001 and 2010. Using regression analysis, as well as the indirect standardization approach, we found that mental health appears to have substantially improved in most studied countries during the past decade. Specifically, both the proportion of people with poor mental health, as well as wealth-related inequalities in poor mental health, decreased in almost all countries, except Georgia. Hence, we did not find evidence of a trade-off between changes in average and distributional mental health indicators between 2001 and 2010. Our findings give ground for optimism that at least on these measures, the most difficult times associated with the transition to a market economy in this region may be coming to an end. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Criminal victimisation and health: Examining the relation in nine countries of the former Soviet Union
    Stickley, Andrew
    Koyanagi, Ai
    Roberts, Bayard
    Rotman, David
    McKee, Martin
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 91 : 76 - 83
  • [22] Present at the creation: Mental health law in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union
    Appelbaum, PS
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 1998, 49 (10) : 1299 - 1300
  • [23] FORMS OF GOVERNMENT IN THE FOREIGN COUNTRIES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION
    Khudoley, K. M.
    Khudoley, D. M.
    [J]. VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-JURIDICHESKIE NAUKI, 2018, (03): : 371 - 395
  • [24] Disability and loneliness in nine countries of the former Soviet Union
    Stickley, Andrew
    Kondo, Naoki
    Richardson, Erica
    Leinsalu, Mall
    Waldman, Kyle
    Oh, Hans
    Inoue, Yosuke
    Shakespeare, Tom
    McKee, Martin
    [J]. DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [25] Natives of the former Soviet Union countries in contemporary Russia
    Abylkalikov, S., I
    [J]. SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2016, (04): : 42 - +
  • [26] Understanding population health: lessons from the former Soviet Union
    McKee, M
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2005, 5 (04) : 374 - 378
  • [27] Telecommunications equipment certification in the countries of the Former Soviet Union
    U.S. Federal Communications, Commission
    [J]. Compliance Eng, 1 (6pp):
  • [28] Reprivatisation and economic transformation in the countries of the former Soviet Union
    Liakin, AI
    [J]. SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMY: THEORY AND ETHICS OF THE ECONOMIC ORDER, 1998, : 139 - 157
  • [29] Sugar industries of the Former Soviet Union (FSU) countries
    Gudoshnikov, Sergey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2009, 111 (1322): : 60 - 69
  • [30] Reforming budget systems in countries of the former Soviet Union
    Mikesell, JL
    Mullins, DR
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2001, 61 (05) : 548 - 568