Will Men Use Novel Male Contraceptive Methods and Will Women Trust Them? A Systematic Review

被引:18
|
作者
Reynolds-Wright, John J. [1 ]
Cameron, Nicholas J. [2 ]
Anderson, Richard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, MRC Ctr Reprod Hlth, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00224499.2021.1905764
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Novel male contraceptives have been in development for almost as long as female methods, yet there are no products available on the market. Hormonal approaches tested clinically to date include the use of oral, injectable, implant and transdermal methods. The study of attitudes toward male contraception has been inconsistent and there have been no systematic reviews drawing these data together. We conducted a systematic review of the available evidence for male and female acceptability of novel male contraception. We identified 32 studies and present a narrative synthesis of quantitative data and a thematic synthesis of qualitative data. In novel drug trials, the proportion of male participants willing to use a male contraceptive ranged from 34.0% to as high as 82.3%. In studies regarding hypothetical drugs, male willingness to use ranged from 13.6% to 83.0%. High proportions of women (42.8%-94.0%) reported willingness to use a novel male method in both hypothetical studies and actual drug trials. In qualitative studies, both men and women expressed the desire to share responsibility for contraception. There is consistent interest among both men and women in novel male contraceptive methods and willingness to use them. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42020173281.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 849
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hormonal contraceptive use and the objectification of women and men
    Piccoli, Valentina
    Cobey, Kelly D.
    Carnaghi, Andrea
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 66 : 44 - 47
  • [22] Male Hormonal Contraceptive Safety: A Systematic Review of Adverse Events Across Investigational Methods
    Franks, Jennifer M.
    Nguyen, Brian T.
    Dinalo, Jen
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 11S - 11S
  • [23] PREVENTING SECONDARY EXPOSURE TO WOMEN FROM MEN APPLYING A NOVEL MALE HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVE GEL
    Yuen, F.
    Wu, S.
    Swerdloff, R.
    Page, S.
    Liu, P.
    Dart, C.
    Blithe, D.
    Sitruk-Ware, R.
    Bai, F.
    Hull, L.
    Bremner, W.
    Anawalt, B.
    Wang, C.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (01) : 166 - 167
  • [24] Contraceptive methods: Knowledge sources rated by women and men
    Virjo, I
    Kirkkola, AL
    Isokoski, M
    Mattila, K
    CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 59 (04) : 257 - 263
  • [25] SAFETY OF CONTRACEPTIVE USE AMONG WOMEN WITH CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Abarbanell, Ginnie I.
    Honein, Margaret
    Tepper, Naomi
    Farr, Sherry
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 949 - 949
  • [26] Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Curtis, Kathryn
    Nanda, Kavita
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (01) : 17 - 37
  • [27] Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review
    Phillips, Sharon J.
    Tepper, Naomi K.
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Nanda, Kavita
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (03) : 226 - 252
  • [28] Safety of contraceptive use among women with congenital heart disease: A systematic review
    Abarbanell, Ginnie
    Tepper, Naomi K.
    Farr, Sherry L.
    CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, 2019, 14 (03) : 331 - 340
  • [29] Combined hormonal contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: an updated systematic review
    Tepper, Naomi K.
    Phillips, Sharon J.
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Gaffield, Mary E.
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (03) : 262 - 274
  • [30] Hormonal contraceptive methods and risk of HIV acquisition in women: a systematic review of epidemiological evidence
    Polis, Chelsea B.
    Phillips, Sharon J.
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    Westreich, Daniel J.
    Steyn, Petrus S.
    Raymond, Elizabeth
    Hannaford, Philip
    Turner, Abigail Norris
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 90 (04) : 360 - 390