Considerations in the application of spatial domain algorithms to operational modal analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Chauhan, S. [1 ]
Martell, R. [1 ]
Brown, D. L. [1 ]
Allemang, R. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Mech Ind & Nucl Engn, Struct Dynam Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The Complex Mode Indicator Function (or CMIF) is a popular spatial domain modal parameter estimation technique that utilizes the singular value decomposition of the frequency response function matrix for estimating the modal parameters of the system. Due to several advantages like identification of closely spaced modes, this technique is extremely popular for modal parameter estimation purposes. In recent times, the Frequency Domain Decomposition (FDD) technique [8] was developed that extends the CMIF algorithm to the operational modal analysis framework. The FDD technique works on the power spectrums unlike working on frequency response functions as in conventional modal analysis. Normally the FDD is followed by the Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (eFDD) [9] to complete the overall parameter estimation procedure. In this paper an alternative to the eFDD, the previously introduced Enhanced Mode Indicator Function (EMIF), is reviewed and extended to the operational modal analysis framework. This algorithm differs from the eFDD in that the parameter estimation is carried out in the frequency domain. Further the paper analyzes the application of spatial domain algorithms to operational modal analysis framework in more detail. It discusses the critical issues and limitations associated with the application of spatial domain algorithms to the OMA framework under different excitation scenarios and proposes a simple tool, Singular Value Percentage Contribution (SVPC) plot to deal effectively with them.
引用
收藏
页码:3087 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intelligent Automatic Operational Modal Analysis: Application to a Tall Building
    Rosso, Marco Martino
    Aloisio, Angelo
    Parol, Jafarali
    Marano, Giuseppe C.
    Quaranta, Giuseppe
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE, VOL 1, IOMAC 2024, 2024, 514 : 695 - 703
  • [32] CONDITION MONITORING OF OPERATING PIPELINES WITH OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS APPLICATION
    Mironov, Aleksey
    Doronkin, Pavel
    Priklonsky, Aleksander
    Kabashkin, Igor
    TRANSPORT AND TELECOMMUNICATION JOURNAL, 2015, 16 (04) : 305 - 319
  • [33] Reducing coherent filtering artefacts in time-domain operational modal analysis
    Wynne, Zachariah
    Hopgood, James R.
    Stratford, Tim
    Reynolds, Thomas P. S.
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2022, 29 (08):
  • [34] Uncertainties on modal parameters by operational modal analysis
    Viet Hung Vu
    Thomas, Marc
    MECHANICS & INDUSTRY, 2014, 15 (02) : 153 - 158
  • [35] Operational modal analysis of Canton Tower by a fast frequency domain Bayesian method
    Zhang, Feng-Liang
    Ni, Yi-Qing
    Ni, Yan-Chun
    Wang, You-Wu
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 17 (02) : 209 - 230
  • [36] A VARIABLE SEPARATION TECHNIQUE FOR FAST BAYESIAN OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS IN THE FREQUENCY DOMAIN
    Yan, Wangji
    Katafygiotis, Lambros
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND II, 2014, : 1881 - 1891
  • [37] MODAL MASS IN CLASSICAL AND OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS
    Aenlle, M.
    Pelayo, F.
    Brincker, R.
    8TH IOMAC INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE, 2019, : 471 - 480
  • [38] Frequency-domain TLS and GTLS algorithms for modal analysis applications
    Verboven, P
    Guillaume, P
    Parloo, E
    TOTAL LEAST SQUARES AND ERRORS-IN-VARIABLES MODELING: ANALYSIS, ALGORITHMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2002, : 305 - 318
  • [40] Latent variable model and its application to Bayesian operational modal analysis
    Zhu, Wei
    Li, Bin-Bin
    Xie, Yan-Long
    Chen, Xiao-Yu
    Zhendong Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2024, 37 (09): : 1476 - 1484