Valid and approximately valid confidence intervals for current status data

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Sungwook [1 ]
Fay, Michael P. [2 ]
Proschan, Michael A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] NIAID, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
asymptotic coverage; binomial properties; Clopper and Pearson interval; guaranteed coverage; mid P‐ value; nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation (NPMLE); smoothed maximum likelihood estimation (SMLE);
D O I
10.1111/rssb.12422
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
We introduce a new approach for creating pointwise confidence intervals for the distribution of event times for current status data. Existing methods are based on asymptotics. Our approach is based on binomial properties and motivates confidence intervals that are very simple to apply and are valid that is guarantee nominal coverage. Although these confidence intervals are necessarily conservative for small sample sizes, asymptotically their coverage rate approaches the nominal one. This binomial approach also motivates approximately valid confidence intervals, and simulations show that these approximate intervals generally have coverage rates closer to the nominal level with shorter length than existing intervals, such as the confidence interval based on the likelihood ratio test. Unlike previous asymptotic methods that require different asymptotic distributions for continuous or grid-based assessment, the binomial approach can be applied to either type of assessment distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 452
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Question to answer requires valid data
    Tuteur, PG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1996, 30 (05) : 642 - 642
  • [42] Is the current formulation of the radiation of an accelerated charge valid?
    Huang, Young Sea
    [J]. NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA B-BASIC TOPICS IN PHYSICS, 2009, 124 (09): : 925 - 929
  • [43] Current erosion indices - flawed or valid? Summary
    Young, Alix
    Amaechi, Bennett T.
    Dugmore, Christopher
    Holbrook, Peter
    Nunn, June
    Schiffner, Ulrich
    Lussi, Adrian
    Ganss, Carolina
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2008, 12 (Suppl 1) : S59 - S63
  • [44] Still Valid: Humanities Education in Current Society
    Li, Xuewu
    [J]. 2016 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SPORTS EDUCATION (ESE 2016), PT 1, 2016, 51 : 202 - 205
  • [45] Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid?
    Moser, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 : S3 - S10
  • [46] REVIEWING THE GENUS CYCLIDIOPSIS: IS THE CURRENT TAXONOMY VALID?
    Bennett, M. S.
    Triemer, R. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 2011, 47 : 43 - 43
  • [47] Current erosion indices—flawed or valid? Summary
    Alix Young
    Bennett T. Amaechi
    Christopher Dugmore
    Peter Holbrook
    June Nunn
    Ulrich Schiffner
    Adrian Lussi
    Carolina Ganss
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2008, 12 : 59 - 63
  • [48] Current Tests for Valid Family Partnership Arrangements
    Schulman, Robert A.
    [J]. TAXES-THE TAX MAGAZINE, 1953, 31 (06): : 447 - 456
  • [49] Citizen Preparedness for Disasters: Are Current Assumptions Valid?
    Uscher-Pines, Lori
    Chandra, Anita
    Acosta, Joie
    Kellermann, Arthur
    [J]. DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2012, 6 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [50] FUZZY INTERVALS TO REPRESENT FUZZY VALID TIME IN A TEMPORAL RELATIONAL DATABASE
    Garrido, Carmen
    Marin, Nicolas
    Pons, Olga
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2009, 17 : 173 - 192