Stakeholder Engagement for Corporate Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of B2C and B2B Companies

被引:31
|
作者
Johnson, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Redlbacher, Friederike [2 ]
Schaltegger, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Management, Luneburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Fac Business Econ & Social Sci, Rentzelstr 7, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
corporate sustainability; stakeholder engagement; customer segment; sustainability reporting; environmental management; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; TO-BUSINESS RESEARCH; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; RELATIVE PRESENCE; PERFORMANCE; CSR; MOTIVATIONS; DISCLOSURE; STRATEGIES; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1002/csr.1484
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Stakeholder engagement is vital for corporate sustainability for various reasons from securing legitimacy to spurring innovation. While stakeholder engagement is well established in academic discourse, recent studies have examined the effects of customer segments on this engagement for corporate sustainability. Initial empirical analyses indicated that business-to-consumer companies are more frequently scrutinized on their sustainability activities than business-to-business companies, and subsequently they are more likely to report on sustainability activities. Nevertheless, further approaches of stakeholder engagement, including stakeholder engagement tools, environmental management standards, and various activities, have not been investigated thus far. This paper compares various approaches of stakeholder engagement according to customer segment based on a 2012 empirical study of large German companies. The results show that customer segment has no major significant influence on stakeholder engagement, but rather value-oriented aspects of firms, including family-run operations and sustainability values in a company's business, make a difference to these activities. Copyright (c) 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 673
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-creation: a B2C and B2B comparative analysis
    Monteiro Christoph D'Andrea, Fernando Antonio
    Rigon, Filipe
    Lopes de Almeida, Ana Carolina
    Filomena, Bertran da Silveira
    Slongo, Luiz Antonio
    [J]. MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2019, 37 (06) : 674 - 688
  • [2] Employer Branding in B2B and B2C Companies in India: A Qualitative Perspective
    Biswas, Mukesh K.
    Suar, Damodar
    [J]. SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 5 (01): : 76 - 95
  • [4] Social media branding in the food industry: comparing B2B and B2C companies' use of sustainability messaging on Twitter
    Garner, Benjamin
    Mady, Ashraf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2023, 38 (11) : 2485 - 2504
  • [5] Should tweets differ for B2B and B2C? An analysis of Fortune 500 companies' Twitter communications
    Swani, Kunal
    Brown, Brian P.
    Milne, George R.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2014, 43 (05) : 873 - 881
  • [6] SOCIAL NETWORKS IN B2B AND B2C COMMUNICATION
    Davidaviciene, Vida
    Pabedinskaite, Arnoldina
    Davidavicius, Sigitas
    [J]. TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2017, 16 (01): : 69 - 84
  • [7] Thoughts: premium pricing in B2C and B2B
    Hinterhuber, Andreas
    Liozu, Stephan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REVENUE AND PRICING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 17 (04) : 301 - 305
  • [8] 重新审视B2B与B2C
    李莉莉
    [J]. 电子商务世界, 2001, (03) : 77 - 77
  • [9] B2B公司的“B2C化”
    Monica Menghini
    [J]. 商学院, 2012, (09) : 66 - 67
  • [10] Knowledge-Oriented Leadership in high tech Companies on B2B and B2C Markets
    Soniewicki, Marcin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2021), 2021, : 716 - 724