The environmental impact of activities after life: life cycle assessment of funerals

被引:11
|
作者
Keijzer, Elisabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] TNO, Post Box 80015, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Burial; Cremation; Environmental impacts; Funerals; LCA; SUSTAINABILITY; CONTAMINATION; LAND; SOIL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1183-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Although the funeral market is propagating new 'green' alternatives and exploring innovative techniques like resomation, very little is known about the environmental impact of funerals. This research aimed to develop a benchmark of funerals, by quantifying the environmental impacts of the most common funeral techniques, i.e. burial and cremation, by identifying where the main impacts originate from and by comparing these impacts to impacts of other activities during a person's life. Methods The environmental impacts of funerals were analysed by means of a life cycle assessment (LCA), based on Dutch company information, literature and expert judgements. The results were analysed per impact category but also on an aggregated level by means of shadow prices. Two sensitivity analyses were performed: one examined the high impact of cotton in funeral coffins; the other checked the results by means of another weighting method. Results and discussion The results showed no significant difference between the two funeral techniques in five impact categories. Burial has the lowest impact in more than half of the categories, but its impact is many times higher in the two most differing categories than for cremation. The total shadow price of burial is about 30 % higher than the shadow price of cremation, but the main cause for this difference is a highly debated category, namely land use. If the results would be considered without the shadow prices of land impact categories, burial would score 25 % lower than cremation. These results are representing average practise and may deviate on certain aspects for other countries, but as a starting point for further studies, this benchmark is well applicable. Conclusions and recommendations This study delivered an environmental benchmark of funerals and insights in the impacts of the individual processes, which can be used in further assessment of 'green' funeral options. The benchmark results show that the environmental impact of funerals is largely determined by secondary processes and that the total impact can be quite small in comparison to other human activities. Besides these environmental insights, it is important to take into account social, cultural, climatic, local, economical and ethical arguments before changing policies or giving recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 730
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental Impact Assessment of Biorefinery Products Using Life Cycle Analysis
    Kark, Paraskevi
    Papadokonstantakis, Stavros
    Hungerbuehler, Konrad
    Kokossis, Antonis
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS DESIGN, 2014, 34 : 543 - 548
  • [42] Life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of arable crop production
    Brentrup, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (03): : 156 - 156
  • [43] Environmental Impact Analysis in the Cement Industry with Life Cycle Assessment Method
    Candraningtyas, Callista Fabiola
    Arfiantinosa, Nassa
    Matin, Hashfi Hawali Abdul
    Azad, Mozakkir
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 25 (06): : 258 - 270
  • [44] Environmental impact of beef production in Mexico through life cycle assessment
    Rivera Huerta, Adriana
    Patricia Guereca, Leonor
    Rubio Lozano, Maria de la Salud
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2016, 109 : 44 - 53
  • [45] REDUCTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT BY INCORPORATING PERFORMANCE ORIENTED LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    Prathap, Paulraj
    Senthilkumaran, Durairaj
    ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ENGINEERING, 2016, 42 (01): : 113 - 122
  • [46] Environmental Impact of Landfilling Verses Composting in Tehran: A Life Cycle Assessment
    Abduli, M. A.
    Naghib, A.
    Yonesi, Mansoor
    Akbari, Ali
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICEST 2010), 2010, : 130 - 137
  • [47] Environmental indicators for communication of life cycle impact assessment results and their applications
    Lim, Seong-Rin
    Park, Jong Moon
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (11) : 3305 - 3312
  • [48] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of a bridge with different strengthening schemes
    Pang, Bo
    Yang, Pengchao
    Wang, Yuanfeng
    Kendall, Alissa
    Xie, Huibing
    Zhang, Yurong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (09): : 1300 - 1311
  • [49] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of green tea production in China
    Sun, Mengqi
    Jia, Xuexiu
    Yang, Dong
    Lu, Bin
    Han, Feng
    Shi, Feng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [50] Life cycle assessment of agricultural waste recycling for sustainable environmental impact
    Sumiyati, S.
    Samadikun, B. P.
    Widiyanti, A.
    Budihardjo, M. A.
    Al Qadar, S.
    Puspita, A. S.
    GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT-GJESM, 2024, 10 (02): : 907 - 938