The environmental impact of activities after life: life cycle assessment of funerals

被引:11
|
作者
Keijzer, Elisabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] TNO, Post Box 80015, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Burial; Cremation; Environmental impacts; Funerals; LCA; SUSTAINABILITY; CONTAMINATION; LAND; SOIL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1183-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Although the funeral market is propagating new 'green' alternatives and exploring innovative techniques like resomation, very little is known about the environmental impact of funerals. This research aimed to develop a benchmark of funerals, by quantifying the environmental impacts of the most common funeral techniques, i.e. burial and cremation, by identifying where the main impacts originate from and by comparing these impacts to impacts of other activities during a person's life. Methods The environmental impacts of funerals were analysed by means of a life cycle assessment (LCA), based on Dutch company information, literature and expert judgements. The results were analysed per impact category but also on an aggregated level by means of shadow prices. Two sensitivity analyses were performed: one examined the high impact of cotton in funeral coffins; the other checked the results by means of another weighting method. Results and discussion The results showed no significant difference between the two funeral techniques in five impact categories. Burial has the lowest impact in more than half of the categories, but its impact is many times higher in the two most differing categories than for cremation. The total shadow price of burial is about 30 % higher than the shadow price of cremation, but the main cause for this difference is a highly debated category, namely land use. If the results would be considered without the shadow prices of land impact categories, burial would score 25 % lower than cremation. These results are representing average practise and may deviate on certain aspects for other countries, but as a starting point for further studies, this benchmark is well applicable. Conclusions and recommendations This study delivered an environmental benchmark of funerals and insights in the impacts of the individual processes, which can be used in further assessment of 'green' funeral options. The benchmark results show that the environmental impact of funerals is largely determined by secondary processes and that the total impact can be quite small in comparison to other human activities. Besides these environmental insights, it is important to take into account social, cultural, climatic, local, economical and ethical arguments before changing policies or giving recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 730
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The environmental impact of activities after life: life cycle assessment of funerals
    Elisabeth Keijzer
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 715 - 730
  • [2] ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment
    Sven -Olof Ryding
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1999, 4 (6) : 307 - 307
  • [3] Life cycle assessment as a tool in environmental impact assessment
    Tukker, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2000, 20 (04) : 435 - 456
  • [4] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of a solar heater
    Koroneos, C.
    Drosos, G.
    Roumbas, G.
    Moussiopoulos, N.
    Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Vol A, Oral Presentations, 2003, : 508 - 514
  • [5] Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental Impact of Steelmaking Process
    Liu, Huimin
    Li, Qiqiang
    Li, Guanguan
    Ding, Ran
    COMPLEXITY, 2020, 2020
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment, ExternE and Comprehensive Analysis for an integrated evaluation of the environmental impact of anthropogenic activities
    Pietrapertosa, F.
    Cosmi, C.
    Macchiato, M.
    Salvia, M.
    Cuomo, V.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (05): : 1039 - 1048
  • [7] Environmental Life Cycle Assessment
    Weidema, Bo
    Brandao, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (03) : 726 - 730
  • [8] Environmental impact assessment of green roofs using life cycle assessment
    Rasul, M. G.
    Arutla, L. K. R.
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 : 503 - 508
  • [9] Environmental impact of drill and blast tunnelling: life cycle assessment
    Huang, Lizhen
    Bohne, Rolf Andre
    Bruland, Amund
    Jakobsen, Pal Drevland
    Lohne, Jardar
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 86 : 110 - 117
  • [10] Artificial Reef: Status, Life Cycle, and Environmental Impact Assessment
    Suzdaleva A.L.
    Beznosov V.N.
    Power Technology and Engineering, 2021, 55 (4) : 558 - 561