Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:66
|
作者
Xu, Dandan [1 ]
Li, Guowen [1 ]
Li, Hongfei [1 ]
Jia, Fei [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
dose-volume histograms; esophageal cancer; intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT); overall survival; radiation toxicity; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT); INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; CARCINOMA; ARC;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000007685
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common cancer with high mortality because of its rapid progression and poor prognosis. Radiotherapy is one of the most effective treatments for EC. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are 2 recently developed radiotherapy techniques. IMRT is believed to be more effective than 3D-CRT in target coverage, dose homogeneity, and reducing toxicity to normal organs. However, these advantages have not been demonstrated in the treatment of EC. This meta-analysis was performed to compare IMRT and 3D-CRT in the treatment of EC in terms of dose-volume histograms and outcomes including survival and toxicity. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases from their inceptions to Dec 30, 2016. Two authors independently assessed the included studies and extracted data. The average percent irradiated volumes of adjacent noncancerous organs were calculated and compared between IMRT and 3D-CRT. The odds ratio of overall survival (OS), and radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis was also evaluated. Results: Totally 7 studies were included. Of them, 5 studies (80 patients) were included in the dosimetric comparison, 3 studies (871 patients) were included in the OS analysis, and 2 studies (205 patients) were included in the irradiation toxicity analysis. For lung in patients receiving doses >= 20 Gy and heart in patients receiving dose =50 Gy, the average irradiated volumes of IMRT were less than those from 3D-CRT. IMRT resulted in a higher OS than 3D-CRT. However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis between 2 radiotherapy techniques. Conclusion: Our data suggest that IMRT-delivered high radiation dose produces significantly less average percent volumes of irradiated lung and heart than 3D-CRT. IMRT is superior to 3D-CRT in the OS of EC while shows no benefit on radiation toxicity.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of normal tissue dosimetry for 3D-CRT and IMRT techniques in prostate irradiation
    Pesznyak, C.
    Pocza, T.
    Bencsik, B.
    Major, T.
    Agoston, P.
    Szabo, Z.
    Jorgo, K.
    Polgar, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S186 - S186
  • [32] Dosimetric comparison of 3D-CRT to IMRT for percutaneous accelerated partial breast irradiation
    Duma, M. N.
    Hugo, C.
    Ertel, E.
    Winkler, C.
    Geinitz, H.
    Molls, M.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 186 : 36 - 37
  • [33] An experimental comparison of whole-body photon doses for IMRT and 3D-CRT
    Xu, XG
    Wang, B
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1991 - 1991
  • [34] Systematic review of the effect of radiation dose on tumor control and morbidity in the treatment of prostate cancer by 3D-CRT
    van Tol-Geerdink, JJ
    Stalmeier, PFM
    Pasker-de Jong, PCM
    Huizenga, H
    van Lin, ENJT
    Schimmel, EC
    Leer, JW
    van Daal, WAJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (02): : 534 - 543
  • [35] Comparison of the treatment plans using 3D-CRT and IMRT for patients enrolled in the dahanca-9 protocol
    Eilertsen, K
    Furre, T
    Evensen, JF
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S99 - S99
  • [36] Comparison of peripheral doses associated to SBRT, VMAT, IMRT, FFF and 3D-CRT plans for lung cancer
    Irazola, L.
    Ortiz-Seidel, M.
    Velazquez, S.
    Garcia-Hernandez, M.
    Terron, J.
    Sanchez-Nieto, B.
    Romero-Exposito, M.
    Rosello, J.
    Sanchez-Doblado, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S750 - S751
  • [37] Efficacy of IMRT vs 3D-CRT While Treating Cervical Cancer Patients
    Podder, T.
    Dey, A.
    Biswas, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E526 - E526
  • [38] Comparison of Preoperative Partial Breast Radiosurgery Treatment Techniques: 3D-CRT, Non-Coplanar IMRT, Coplanar IMRT, and VMAT
    Yoo, S.
    Blitzblau, R.
    Yin, F.
    Horton, J. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S215 - S215
  • [39] Doses to heart structures in breast cancer: comparing 3D-CRT to IMRT technique
    Soraya, M. M.
    Vazquez, M.
    Giraldo, A.
    Altabas, M.
    Granado, R.
    Sanchez, D.
    Giralt, J.
    Reyes, V.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S819 - S819
  • [40] Quality of life and xerostomia with IMRT versus 3D-CRT in postoperative head and neck radiotherapy
    Van der Laan, H. P.
    Bijl, H. P.
    Vemer-Van den Hoek, J. G. M.
    Steenbakkers, R. J. H. M.
    Rietveld, D. H. F.
    Vergeer, M. R.
    Leemans, C. R.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S317 - S318