Comparison of model predictions of image quality with results of clinical trials in chest and lumbar spine screen-film imaging

被引:10
|
作者
Sandborg, M [1 ]
McVey, G
Dance, DR
Carlsson, GA
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiat Phys, IMV, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust & Inst Canc Res, London SW3 6JJ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ability to predict image quality from known physical and technical parameters is a prerequisite for making successful dose optimisation. In this study, imaging systems have been simulated using a Monte Carlo model of the imaging systems. The model includes a voxelised human anatomy and quantifies image quality in terms of contrast and signal-to-noise ratio for 5-6 anatomical details included in the anatomy. The imaging systems used in clinical trials were simulated and the ranking of the systems by the model and radiologists compared. The model and the results of the trial for chest PA both show that using a high maximum optical density was significantly better than using a low one. The model predicts that a good system is characterised by a large dynamic range and a high contrast of the blood vessels in the retrocardiac area. The ranking by the radiologists and the model agreed for the lumbar spine AP.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 176
页数:4
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF THE IMAGE QUALITY OF A HIGH-RESOLUTION SCREEN-FILM SYSTEM AND A DIGITAL FLAT PANEL DETECTOR SYSTEM IN AVIAN RADIOGRAPHY
    Bochmann, Monika
    Ludewig, Eberhard
    Krautwald-Junghanns, Maria-Elisabeth
    Pees, Michael
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2011, 52 (03) : 256 - 261
  • [22] Amorphous silicon technology based digital radiography of the skeleton: Image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography
    Volk, M
    Strotzer, M
    Holzknecht, N
    Manke, C
    Lenhart, M
    Gmeinwieser, JK
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 328 - 328
  • [23] Comparison of image quality and diagnostic efficacy of routine clinical lumbar spine imaging at 0.55T and 1.5/3T
    Lavrova, Anna
    Seiberlich, Nicole
    Kelsey, Lauren
    Richardson, Jacob
    Comer, John
    Masotti, Maria
    Itriago-Leon, Pedro
    Wright, Katherine
    Mishra, Shruti
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 175
  • [24] Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a phantom model
    Krug, Kathrin Barbara
    Stuetzer, Hartmut
    Girnus, Ralf
    Zaehringer, Markus
    Gossmann, Axel
    Winnekendonk, Guido
    Lackner, Klaus
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (02) : 399 - 407
  • [25] Chest radiography with a large-area detector based on cesium-iodide/amorphous-silicon technology -: Image quality and dose requirement in comparison with an asymmetric screen-film system
    Strotzer, M
    Völk, M
    Reiser, M
    Lenhart, M
    Manke, C
    Gmeinwieser, J
    Holzknecht, N
    Link, J
    Feuerbach, S
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2000, 15 (03) : 157 - 161
  • [26] Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector vs screen-film and storage phosphor systems in chest imaging: Comparison of the entrance skin dose
    Smeets, PV
    Bacher, K
    Duyck, P
    Verstraete, KL
    Thierens, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 382 - 382
  • [27] Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial
    Van Ongeval, C
    Bosmans, H
    Van Steen, A
    Joossens, K
    Celis, V
    Van Goethem, M
    Verslegers, I
    Nijs, K
    Rogge, F
    Marchal, G
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (06) : 1360 - 1366
  • [28] Evaluation of high-resolution digital mammography with dual-side light collection image-reading technology: Comparison with screen-film mammography for diagnostic quality in clinical images
    Tsukahara, A
    Kishimoto, R
    Yamazaki, R
    Tsuzuki, T
    Nagata, T
    Miyasaka, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 118 - 118
  • [29] Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: Comparison of image quality in a phantom study
    Veldkamp, WJH
    Kroft, LJM
    Mertens, BJA
    Geleijns, J
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (03) : 857 - 866
  • [30] Performance of a flat-panel detector system in the depiction of anatomic details of the lumbar spine in Cynomolgus Monkeys: Comparison to a screen-film and a storage-phosphor system using different exposure doses
    Ludwig, K
    Ahlers, K
    Diederich, S
    Bernhardt, TM
    Freund, M
    Heindel, WL
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 642 - 642