Comparison of model predictions of image quality with results of clinical trials in chest and lumbar spine screen-film imaging

被引:10
|
作者
Sandborg, M [1 ]
McVey, G
Dance, DR
Carlsson, GA
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiat Phys, IMV, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust & Inst Canc Res, London SW3 6JJ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ability to predict image quality from known physical and technical parameters is a prerequisite for making successful dose optimisation. In this study, imaging systems have been simulated using a Monte Carlo model of the imaging systems. The model includes a voxelised human anatomy and quantifies image quality in terms of contrast and signal-to-noise ratio for 5-6 anatomical details included in the anatomy. The imaging systems used in clinical trials were simulated and the ranking of the systems by the model and radiologists compared. The model and the results of the trial for chest PA both show that using a high maximum optical density was significantly better than using a low one. The model predicts that a good system is characterised by a large dynamic range and a high contrast of the blood vessels in the retrocardiac area. The ranking by the radiologists and the model agreed for the lumbar spine AP.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 176
页数:4
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen-film radiography
    Sandborg, M
    Tingberg, A
    Dance, DR
    Lanhede, B
    Almén, A
    McVey, G
    Sund, P
    Kheddache, S
    Besjakov, J
    Mattsson, S
    Månsson, LG
    Carlsson, GA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (882): : 520 - 528
  • [2] PORTABLE CHEST IMAGING - COMPARISON OF STORAGE PHOSPHOR DIGITAL, ASYMMETRIC SCREEN-FILM, AND CONVENTIONAL SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMS
    NIKLASON, LT
    CHAN, HP
    CASCADE, PN
    CHANG, CL
    CHEE, PW
    MATHEWS, JF
    RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) : 387 - 393
  • [3] Quality Imaging -: Comparison of CR Mammography with Screen-Film Mammography
    Gaona, E.
    Nieto, J. Azorin
    Gongora, J. A. Iran Diaz
    Arreola, M.
    Castellanoso, G. Casian
    Castaneda, G. M. Perdigon
    Enriquez, J. G. Franco
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 854 : 227 - +
  • [4] COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS FOR EVALUATING IMAGE QUALITY OF RADIOGRAPHIC SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMS
    ROSSMANN, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY RADIUM THERAPY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1966, 97 (03): : 772 - &
  • [5] Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging
    McLean, D
    Gray, JE
    Swensen, SJ
    Vrieze, TJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [6] Clinical comparison of CR and screen-film for imaging the critically-ill neonate
    Andriole, KP
    Brasch, RC
    Gooding, CA
    Could, RG
    Cohen, PA
    Rencken, IR
    Huang, HKB
    PACS DESIGN AND EVALUATION: ENGINEERING AND CLINICAL ISSUES - MEDICAL IMAGING 1996, 1996, 2711 : 281 - 285
  • [7] Chest radiograph quality: Comparison of asymmetric screen-film, storage phosphor, and selenium drum systems
    Beute, GH
    Flynn, MJ
    Eyler, WR
    Samei, E
    Spizarny, DL
    Zylak, CJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 355 - 355
  • [8] Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: Cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging
    Sch. of Med. Radiation Technology, University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Sydney, NSW, Australia
    不详
    不详
    Eur. J. Radiol., 1 (61-66):
  • [9] Optimization of radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology: Digital and screen-film imaging
    Gray, J
    Strauss, K
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1805 - 1805
  • [10] Use of the European image quality criteria for screen-film comparison - Application for asymmetric systems
    Guibelalde, E
    Morillo, A
    Fernandez, JM
    Vano, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (817): : 64 - 69