High Frequency (10 kHz) or Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients With Predominant Back Pain: Preliminary Data From a Prospective Observational Study

被引:48
|
作者
Kinfe, Thomas M. [1 ,2 ]
Pintea, Bogdan [1 ]
Link, Carolina [3 ]
Roeske, Sandra [4 ,5 ]
Gueresir, Erdem [1 ]
Gueresir, Agi [1 ]
Vatter, Hartmut [1 ]
机构
[1] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Bonn, Germany
[2] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Div Funct Neurosurg & Neuromodulat, Bonn, Germany
[3] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Bonn, Germany
[4] German Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis, DZNE, Bonn, Germany
[5] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Hosp, Bonn, Germany
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2016年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
Back pain; burst stimulation; failed back surgery syndrome; high frequency stimulation; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ECONOMIC BURDEN; FOLLOW-UP; MECHANISMS; SYSTEM; THERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/ner.12379
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) exhibits pain relief and improved quality of life in refractory failed back surgery syndrome. However, patients suffering from predominant back pain failed to achieve a favorable neuromodulation outcome. Currently, two new stimulation concepts, the burst and the HF10 stimulation paradigms successfully suppress intractable back pain levels in this difficult-to-treat subgroup. To date, literature data comparing both stimulation patterns is lacking. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted including 16 refractory Failed-back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients with previous spine surgery and predominant back pain (70% of overall pain) with or without leg pain eligible for burst or high-frequency SCS. At baseline and at a three-month follow-up the pain intensity (back pain (VAS(B))/leg pain (VAS(L)), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), changes in severity of depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]) and any adverse event related to the implantation and the stimulation were recorded. Results: Overall baseline VAS(B) was significantly suppressed in 14 FBSS patients (eight burst/six patients with 10 HF10) from baseline 7.9 +/- 0.7 to 2.3 +/- 1 (p<0.001), while the overall VAS(L) declined significantly from 3.1 +/- 1.5 to 1.9 +/- 0.83 (p<0.01). The burst patients experienced significant VAS(L) reduction (burst 1.8 +/- 0.7 (p<0.009) compared to HF10 patients 2.2 +/- 1). Two patients failed 10 HF10-trial. The BDI [23.3 +/- 2.1 to 13.5 +/- 4.5 (p<0.001)] and the PSQI [7.6 +/- 3.7 to 4.2 +/- 1.4 (p<0.003)] dropped down significantly for both modalities. No implantation/stimulation-related complications were observed. Conclusions: Burst and HF10 SCS performed efficiently and safely in intractable FBSS patients with predominant back pain and deserve more refined, specific investigations to determine their efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 274
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spinal cord stimulation use in patients with failed back surgery syndrome
    Lee, Nancy
    Vasudevan, Sridhar
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2012, 2 (02) : 135 - 140
  • [22] Utilization of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
    Lad, Shivanand P.
    Babu, Ranjith
    Bagley, Jacob H.
    Choi, Jonathan
    Bagley, Carlos A.
    Huh, Billy K.
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Patil, Chirag G.
    Boakye, Maxwell
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (12) : E719 - E727
  • [23] Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Evaluated in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
    de Vos, Cecile C.
    Bom, Marjanne J.
    Vanneste, Sven
    Lenders, Mathieu W. P. M.
    de Ridder, Dirk
    NEUROMODULATION, 2014, 17 (02): : 152 - 159
  • [24] A prospective, randomized study of spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome
    North, RB
    Kidd, DH
    Piantadosi, S
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 84 (02) : 839 - 839
  • [25] Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study)
    Rigoard, Philippe
    Desai, Mehul J.
    North, Richard B.
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Annemans, Lieven
    Greening, Christine
    Tan, Ye
    Van den Abeele, Carine
    Shipley, Jane
    Kumar, Krishna
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [26] Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study)
    Philippe Rigoard
    Mehul J Desai
    Richard B North
    Rod S Taylor
    Lieven Annemans
    Christine Greening
    Ye Tan
    Carine Van den Abeele
    Jane Shipley
    Krishna Kumar
    Trials, 14
  • [27] SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION IN FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME
    DELAPORTE, C
    VANDEKELFT, E
    PAIN, 1993, 52 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [28] Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome
    Taras Masnyk
    Frederick D. Brown
    Current Review of Pain, 1998, 2 (2): : 77 - 84
  • [29] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review
    Frey, Michael E.
    Manchikanti, Laxmaiah
    Benyamin, Ramsin M.
    Schultz, David M.
    Smith, Howard S.
    Cohen, Steven P.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2009, 12 (02) : 379 - 397
  • [30] Spinal cord stimulation and return to work of patients with failed back surgery syndrome
    Masson, Valerie Dauriac-Le
    Gatt, Marie-Therese
    Chekroun, Corinne
    Turak, Baris
    Djian, Marie Christine
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2023, 23 (05) : 493 - 500