Severe renal dysfunction complicating cardiogenic shock is not a contraindication to mechanical support as a bridge to cardiac transplantation

被引:26
|
作者
Khot, UN
Mishra, M
Yamani, MH
Smedira, NG
Paganini, E
Yeager, M
Buda, T
McCarthy, PM
Young, JB
Starling, RC
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Kaufman Ctr Heart Failure, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Internal Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Hypertens & Nephrol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02823-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study investigated outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock and severe renal dysfunction treated with ventricular assist devices (VAD) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. BACKGROUND Previous reports have documented poor survival in patients with cardiogenic shock and severe renal dysfunction treated with VAD. METHODS We surveyed 215 consecutive patients who received a VAD from 1992 to 2000 and selected patients who had a serum creatinine greater than or equal to3.0 mg/dl at the time of VAD placement. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical outcome data were collected. RESULTS Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean serum creatinine at the time of VAD placement was 4.0 +/- 0.7 mg/dl (range 3.0 to 5.2 mg/dl). Seven patients required temporary renal support with continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Eleven patients underwent cardiac transplantation. At six months post-transplantation, mean serum creatinine was 2.0 +/- 0.6 mg/dl (range 1.3 to. 3.5 mg/dl). None of the transplanted patients required subsequent renal support. Seven patients died with a VAD before transplantation. Three died early (<1 month) after VAD placement, and all three required CVVHD until death. Four patients survived for >1 month after VAD placement; all four had resolution of renal dysfunction with mean serum creatinine of 1.9 +/- 1.2 mg/dl (range 0.8 to 3.6 mg/dl) without the need for renal support. Overall 30-day and six-month survival after VAD placement, survival to transplantation, and survival one year post-transplantation were similar to patients without severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS Contemporary use of VAD leads to resolution of severe renal dysfunction in most cardiogenic shock patients and comparable long-term outcomes to patients without renal dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 385
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acute renal failure complicating cardiogenic shock is not a contraindication to mechanical support as a bridge to cardiac transplantation
    Khot, UN
    Mishra, M
    Smedira, NG
    Young, JB
    Yeager, M
    Buda, T
    Starling, RC
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (17) : 714 - 715
  • [3] Ischemic cardiogenic shock and short-term mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation
    Renedo, Maria F.
    Chao, Chen
    Absi, Daniel O.
    Bertolotti, Alejandro M.
    Vigliano, Carlos A.
    Favaloro, Roberto R.
    [J]. MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2021, 81 (05) : 761 - 766
  • [4] Axillary Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support to Bridge Cardiogenic Shock Patients to Heart Transplantation
    Aleman, R. A.
    Napoli, F. A.
    Baran, D. A.
    Velez, M. A.
    Estep, J. A.
    Sheffield, C. A.
    Navia, J. L.
    Brozzi, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (04): : S281 - S281
  • [5] Application of "double bridge mechanical" resuscitation for profound cardiogenic shock leading to cardiac transplantation
    Bowen, FW
    Carboni, AF
    O'Hara, ML
    Pochettino, A
    Rosengard, BR
    Morris, RJ
    Gorman, RC
    Gorman, JH
    Acker, MA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (01): : 86 - 90
  • [6] The Future of Mechanical Circulatory Support for Severe Cardiogenic Shock
    Vincent, Douglas E.
    Moazami, Nader
    D'Alessandro, David
    Fraser, John F.
    Heinsar, Silver
    Roche, Ellen T.
    Ayers, Brian C.
    Singh, Manisha
    Langer, Nina
    Deshpande, Shriprasad R.
    Jaquiss, R. D. B.
    Fukamachi, Kiyotaka
    Rabi, Seyed Alireza
    Osho, Asishana
    Kuroda, Taiyo
    Karimov, Jamshid H.
    Miyamoto, Takuma
    Sethu, Palaniappan
    Giridharan, Guruprasad A.
    Kvernebo, Knut
    Copland, Jack
    [J]. JACC-BASIC TO TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 9 (04): : 456 - 458
  • [7] MEDICAL-MANAGEMENT OF CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK AS A BRIDGE TO CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION
    BADELLINO, M
    COHAN, H
    JESSUP, M
    FISH, D
    ALPERN, J
    KOLFF, J
    MCCLURKEN, JB
    CAVAROCCHI, NC
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1988, 16 (04) : 371 - 371
  • [8] Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock complicating spontaneous coronary artery dissection
    Nosair, Waseem
    Araj, Faris G.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 101 (01) : 121 - 121
  • [9] Refractory cardiogenic shock: emergency mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to recovery
    Piatrovich, N. S.
    Shestakova, L. G.
    Ostrovsky, Y. P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 600 - 600
  • [10] Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock
    Ryan, Matt
    Briceno, Natalia
    Perera, Divaka
    [J]. KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2019, 49 (03) : 197 - 213