Ischemic cardiogenic shock and short-term mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Renedo, Maria F. [1 ]
Chao, Chen [2 ]
Absi, Daniel O. [1 ,3 ]
Bertolotti, Alejandro M. [1 ,3 ]
Vigliano, Carlos A. [2 ,4 ]
Favaloro, Roberto R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Fdn Favaloro, Serv Insuficiencia Cardiaca Asistencia Circulator, Dept Trasplante Intratorac, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Hosp Univ Fdn Favaloro, Serv Anat Patol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Hosp Univ Fdn Favaloro, Dept Cirugia Cardiovasc, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Hosp Univ Fdn Favaloro, Inst Med Traslac Trasplante & Bioingn CONICET Uni, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; short-term mechanical circulatory devices support; heart transplantation; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; INTERVENTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cardiogenic shock (CS) has a high mortality rate and often requires advanced therapies such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation (HT). Those patients who presented an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with CS and required support through MCS as bridge to HT were retrospectively analyzed in a single Center. Between January 1997 and June 2020, 524 patients received HT, 203 for ischemic-cardiomyopathy, 103 were in emergency waiting list. Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 53 +/- 11 years old; men 73%). Five primary angioplasties and 2 emergency myocardial revasculariza-tion surgeries were performed. Four patients had coronary anatomy not subject to revascularization. All received inotropic and vasopressor treatment and required intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Subsequently, two required support with a left univentricular centrifugal pump (BioMedicus (R), Medtronic) and two with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO) (Maquet (R), Getinge Group). The median between AMI and HT was 15 days (range 7-21) and the mean age of the donors 28 +/- 11 years. All had extensive AMI (necrotic amount 35 +/- 5%) with histopathological signs of transmural necrosis and reperfusion injury. The median follow-up was 9 years (range 1-15). None died in hospitalization or during the first year after transplantation. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 73% and 55%. Emergency HT may be the best option for selected patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock refractory to conventional therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 766
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SHORT-TERM MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT AS BRIDGE TO HEART TRANSPLANTATION
    Absi, Daniel
    Giordanino, Elian
    Favaloro, Liliana
    Renedo, Florencia
    Rubira, Magali
    Favaloro, Roberto
    Bertolotti, Alejandro
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 55 - 55
  • [2] Long-term outcome after short-term mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock
    Fux, T.
    Van der Linden, J.
    Grinnemo, K. H.
    Svenarud, P.
    Hultman, J.
    Gabrielsen, A.
    Lund, L. H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 65 - 66
  • [3] Optimal bridge to transplantation strategy using short-term mechanical circulatory support devices
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 34 (10)
  • [4] Shock Team Approach in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support A Proof of Concept
    Taleb, Iosif
    Koliopoulou, Antigone G.
    Tandar, Anwar
    McKellar, Stephen H.
    Tonna, Joseph E.
    Nativi-Nicolau, Jose
    Alvarez Villela, Miguel
    Welt, Frederick
    Stehlik, Josef
    Gilbert, Edward M.
    Wever-Pinzon, Omar
    Morshedzadeh, Jack H.
    Dranow, Elizabeth
    Selzman, Craig H.
    Fang, James C.
    Drakos, Stavros G.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2019, 140 (01) : 98 - 100
  • [5] Axillary Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support to Bridge Cardiogenic Shock Patients to Heart Transplantation
    Aleman, R. A.
    Napoli, F. A.
    Baran, D. A.
    Velez, M. A.
    Estep, J. A.
    Sheffield, C. A.
    Navia, J. L.
    Brozzi, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (04): : S281 - S281
  • [6] Cardiogenic shock-bridging with multimodality short term mechanical circulatory support
    Ahmed, H. Husnat
    Lim, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 353 - 353
  • [7] Adoption of short-term mechanical circulatory support as a viable rescue effort for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock
    Canver, Charles C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 153 (04): : 763 - 764
  • [8] Cardiogenic Shock and Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Options in the Current Era: Focus on Adverse Events
    Taleb, Iosif
    Koliopoulou, Antigone
    Tandar, Anwar
    McKellar, Stephen
    Nativi-Nicolau, Jose
    Athanasiadis, Dimitrios
    Wever-Pinzon, Omar
    Gilbert, Edward
    Fang, James
    Stehlik, Josef
    Tonna, Joseph
    Ibrahim, Homam
    Dranow, Elizabeth
    Selzman, Craig
    Welt, Frederick
    Drakos, Stavros
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2018, 24 (08) : S127 - S127
  • [9] Application of V-A ECMO therapies for short-term mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock
    Musial, Robert
    Darocha, Tomasz
    Kosinski, Sylweriusz
    Stolinski, Jaroslaw
    Sadowski, Jerzy
    Drwila, Rafal
    [J]. ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2015, 47 (04) : 324 - 327
  • [10] Heart transplantation after short-term mechanical circulatory support
    Horvath, Vladimir
    Nemec, Petr
    Ondrasek, Jiri
    Slavika, Jiri
    Pokorny, Petr
    Bedanova, Helena
    Orban, Marek
    [J]. COR ET VASA, 2013, 55 (04) : E320 - E323