Two-Stage Optimal Operation Management of a Microgrid Considering Electricity-Hydrogen Coupling Dynamic Characteristics

被引:3
|
作者
Liu, Xinrui [1 ]
Zhong, Weiyang [1 ]
Hou, Min [1 ]
Luo, Yuqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
hydrogen generation; fuel cell; liquid organic hydrogen carrier; microgrid; renewable energy; grid auxiliary service; STORAGE; SYSTEM; CARRIERS;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2022.856304
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The uncertainty and volatility of renewable energy generation lead to large amounts of abandoned electricity. The electricity-hydrogen coupling microgrid (EHCM) consists of the proton exchange membrane electrolytic cell (PEMEC), liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) hydrogen storage, proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). The structure helps to increase the utilization of wind and photovoltaic power. The scheduling of an EHCM is very challenging. This paper proposes the optimal operation of a microgrid considering the uncertainty of wind speed, light, and the coupling of electricity and hydrogen. The electricity-hydrogen coupling model and hydrogen market model are constructed. The microgrid provides ancillary services to the grid while meeting hydrogen demand. The above model is solved using a two-stage optimization method with time scales of day-ahead and intra-day. Finally, taking the IEEE 33-node microgrid as an example, the effectiveness of the proposed model is verified. The results of the case show that the proposed method can obtain more benefits and reduce carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal operation of an electricity-hydrogen DC microgrid with integrated demand response
    Singh, Abhishek
    Kumar, Alok
    Chinmaya, K. A.
    Maulik, Avirup
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GRIDS & NETWORKS, 2024, 39
  • [2] Capacity Optimization of Hybrid Energy Storage Microgrid Considering Electricity-Hydrogen Coupling
    Li Q.
    Zhao S.
    Pu Y.
    Chen W.
    Yu J.
    Diangong Jishu Xuebao/Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36 (03): : 486 - 495
  • [3] Optimal scheduling of electricity-hydrogen coupling virtual power plant considering hydrogen load response
    Luo, Wenyun
    Xu, Tong
    Fan, Peinan
    Li, Haoran
    Yan, Xiaobin
    Zheng, Yong
    Ma, Rui
    Luo, Yang
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2024, 12
  • [4] Two-stage planning method for regional electricity-hydrogen energy system considering off-grid risk
    Sheng K.
    Wang X.
    Zhang Y.
    Liu Z.
    Si F.
    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2023, 43 (12): : 84 - 92
  • [5] A Two-stage Energy Management Strategy for CCHP Microgrid considering house characteristics
    Luo, Zhao
    Wang, Zhihe
    Gu, Wei
    Tang, Yiyuan
    Xu, Chao
    2015 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2015,
  • [6] Synergistic Optimal Operation of Electricity-Hydrogen Systems Considering Hydrogen Refueling Loads for Fuel Cell Vehicles
    Yuan T.
    Ji L.
    Tian X.
    Li G.
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47 (05): : 16 - 25
  • [7] Two-stage multi-objective distributionally robust optimization of the electricity-hydrogen coupling system under multiple markets
    Du, Yida
    Li, Xiangguang
    Liang, Yan
    Tan, Zhongfu
    ENERGY, 2024, 303
  • [8] Two-stage optimal dispatching for microgrid considering dynamic incentive-based demand response
    Wei Z.
    Zhang H.
    Wei P.
    Liang Z.
    Ma X.
    Sun Z.
    Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49 (19): : 1 - 10
  • [9] A two-stage optimal operation strategy for community integrated energy system considering dynamic and static energy characteristics
    Li, Peng
    Wang, Jiahao
    Li, Canbing
    Ma, Hongwei
    Liu, Yang
    Hou, Lei
    ENERGY, 2024, 308
  • [10] Microgrid Optimal Operation Considering electricity Price Fluctuations
    Zhang Xiaobo
    Zhang Baohui
    Kong Yuan
    Wu Xiong
    2015 27TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2015, : 5122 - 5125