One-year clinical evaluation of two composite materials used for anterior class V restorations

被引:8
|
作者
Sakrana, AA
Tanoue, N
Kawasaki, K
Matsumura, H
机构
[1] Nagasaki Univ, Hosp Dent, Dept Gen Dent, Nagasaki 8528588, Japan
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Crown & Bridge Prosthodont, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] Nihon Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Tokyo 101, Japan
关键词
class V restoration; clinical evaluation; composite; United States Public Health Service criteria;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01333.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the clinical performance of two composite materials used for filling anterior cavity preparations. A total of 100 class V cavities of anterior tooth were restored with two different composite materials (Palfique Estelite and Palfique Toughwell, 50 cavities each, respectively) in combination with the same bonding agent (Mac Bond II). Colour match, cavosurface marginal discolouration, recurrent caries, wear, marginal integrity and surface texture were evaluated clinically for all restorations on the basis of the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria immediately after insertion (baseline), after 6 months and after 1 year. In the comparison of baseline to 1-year evaluation, the Palfique Toughwell material showed significant changes in all factors except recurrent caries. The Palfique Estelite material, however, showed neither significant cavosurface marginal discolouration nor recurrent caries. No significant difference (P > 0b05) was observed between the two materials in clinical performance after 1 year, with the exception of caries rate, which was found to be significantly lower in the Palfique Estelite material. It was concluded that both composites were clinically reliable materials when used for anterior class V restorations.
引用
收藏
页码:985 / 990
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ONE-YEAR ASSESSMENT OF CLASS-V RESTORATIONS INVOLVING TOTAL ETCH
    IANZANO, JA
    GWINNETT, AJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 276 - 276
  • [22] One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass lonomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations
    Brackett, MG
    Dib, A
    Brackett, WW
    Estrada, BE
    Reyes, AA
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2002, 27 (02) : 112 - 116
  • [23] One-year clinical evaluation of compomer restorations placed in general practice
    Crisp, RJ
    Burke, FJT
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 31 (03): : 181 - 186
  • [24] One-year clinical trial of gradia direct class II restorations.
    Fabianelli, A.
    Grandini, S.
    Goracci, C.
    Ferrari, M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B196 - B196
  • [25] One year clinical evaluation of Class V restorations using the Gluma CPS bonding system
    Siegel, B
    Blunck, U
    Roulet, JF
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 954 - 954
  • [26] One-year evaluation of class I ART restorations in Bauru/Brazil.
    Bresciani, E
    Barata, TJE
    Garcia-Godoy, F
    Lauris, JRP
    Navarro, MFL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A140 - A140
  • [27] One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices
    Burke, FJT
    Crisp, RJ
    Bell, TJ
    Healy, A
    Mark, B
    McBirnie, R
    Osborne-Smith, KL
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 32 (04): : 293 - 298
  • [28] Anterior composite restorations:: 1 year evaluation of clinical performance.
    Tanner, J
    Närhi, TO
    Ostela, I
    Nohrström, T
    Narva, K
    Tirri, T
    Vallittu, PK
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A79 - A79
  • [29] One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations
    Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio
    Demarco, Flavio Fernando
    Pereira, Cecilia Luiz
    Lund, Rafael Guerra
    de Carvalho, Ricardo Marins
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2007, 20 (01): : 41 - 45
  • [30] One-year evaluation of class III composite resins.
    Pereira, LCG
    Esmeral, LIL
    Cefaly, DFG
    Ishikiriama, A
    Navarro, MFL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A79 - A79