One-year clinical evaluation of two composite materials used for anterior class V restorations

被引:8
|
作者
Sakrana, AA
Tanoue, N
Kawasaki, K
Matsumura, H
机构
[1] Nagasaki Univ, Hosp Dent, Dept Gen Dent, Nagasaki 8528588, Japan
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Crown & Bridge Prosthodont, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] Nihon Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Tokyo 101, Japan
关键词
class V restoration; clinical evaluation; composite; United States Public Health Service criteria;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01333.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the clinical performance of two composite materials used for filling anterior cavity preparations. A total of 100 class V cavities of anterior tooth were restored with two different composite materials (Palfique Estelite and Palfique Toughwell, 50 cavities each, respectively) in combination with the same bonding agent (Mac Bond II). Colour match, cavosurface marginal discolouration, recurrent caries, wear, marginal integrity and surface texture were evaluated clinically for all restorations on the basis of the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria immediately after insertion (baseline), after 6 months and after 1 year. In the comparison of baseline to 1-year evaluation, the Palfique Toughwell material showed significant changes in all factors except recurrent caries. The Palfique Estelite material, however, showed neither significant cavosurface marginal discolouration nor recurrent caries. No significant difference (P > 0b05) was observed between the two materials in clinical performance after 1 year, with the exception of caries rate, which was found to be significantly lower in the Palfique Estelite material. It was concluded that both composites were clinically reliable materials when used for anterior class V restorations.
引用
收藏
页码:985 / 990
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior Z250 resin composite restorations: one-year evaluation of clinical performance
    Narhi, T. O.
    Tanner, J.
    Ostela, I.
    Narva, K.
    Nohrstrom, T.
    Tirri, T.
    Vallittu, P. K.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2003, 7 (04) : 241 - 243
  • [2] Anterior Z250 resin composite restorations: one-year evaluation of clinical performance
    T. O. Närhi
    J. Tanner
    I. Ostela
    K. Narva
    T. Nohrström
    T. Tirri
    P. K. Vallittu
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2003, 7 : 241 - 243
  • [3] One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations
    Loguercio, AD
    Reis, A
    Rodrigues, LE
    Busato, ALS
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2001, 26 (05) : 427 - 434
  • [4] 6-MONTH AND ONE-YEAR CLINICAL EVALUATION OF A COMPOSITE RESIN FOR CLASS-2 RESTORATIONS
    NUCKLES, DB
    FINGAR, WW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 91 (05): : 1017 - 1022
  • [5] Clinical performance of two composite materials for indirect restorations. One-year follow up.
    Sardi, L
    Brenna, F
    Lombardi, M
    Vogel, M
    Gagliani, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1240 - 1240
  • [6] ONE-YEAR EVALUATION OF A HYBRID COMPOSITE FOR POSTERIOR RESTORATIONS
    PERRY, R
    MCGARY, P
    KUGEL, G
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 404 - 404
  • [7] Class II composite resin restorations;: a five year clinical evaluation of two materials.
    Köhler, B
    Rasmusson, CG
    Ödman, P
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 786 - 786
  • [8] A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations:: One-year report
    de Souza, FB
    Guimaräes, RP
    Silva, CHV
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 36 (01): : 41 - 48
  • [9] One-year clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations
    Mahler, DB
    Engle, JH
    Simms, LE
    Terkla, LG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 127 (03): : 345 - 349
  • [10] One-year clinical evaluation of two composite resins.
    Sá, FC
    Franco, EB
    Souza, JB
    Navarro, MFL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 953 - 953