Testosterone levels among non-obstructive azoospermic patients 2 years after failed bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a nested case-cohort study

被引:8
|
作者
Herndon, Charles C. [1 ,2 ]
Godart, Erica S. [1 ]
Turek, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Turek Clin, 9033 Wilshire Blvd,Suite 408, Beverly Hills, CA 90211 USA
[2] Touro Univ Nevada, Coll Osteopath Med, Henderson, NV USA
关键词
Azoospermia; Hypogonadism; Microdissection; Testicular sperm retrieval; Testosterone; FOLLOW-UP; MEN; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-022-02497-x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To define the risk of hypogonadism following microdissection testicular sperm extraction in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia. While sperm retrieval by open testicular sperm extraction can be associated with an increased risk of hypogonadism, there is limited data addressing which procedures and which patients harbor the greatest risk. Methods We report on a community-acquired, nested, case-cohort of non-obstructive azoospermic patients referred to one clinic after failed bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Patients were health-matched (1:2) to surgically naive controls and divided into 2 cohorts based on risk factors for hypogonadism. Among microdissection patients, we compared total testosterone and gonadotropin levels before and > 6 months after surgery. Biochemical hypogonadism was defined as a total serum testosterone level <= 300 ng/dL. Hormone levels were compared to risk-matched controls. Comparative statistics were used to assess hormone levels within and between cohorts. Results There were no significant differences in baseline testosterone levels between microdissection patients (n = 26) and risk-matched controls (n = 52). At a mean of 26 months (range 6.2-112.8) post-procedure, mean testosterone levels decreased significantly (73 ng/dL or 16%; CI - 27, - 166; p < 0.01, paired t-test). Among microdissection patients with baseline testosterone > 300 ng/dL, 8/22 (36%) experienced hypogonadism post-procedure. There was a corresponding increase in follicle stimulating hormone (p = 0.05) and a trending increase in luteinizing hormones (p = 0.10). Conclusion A durable decrease in testosterone levels occurs after failed microdissection testicular sperm extraction regardless of baseline risk of hypogonadism. In addition, a significant proportion of eugonadal patients will become hypogonadal after failed testicular microdissection procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1303
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ROLE OF TESTICULAR BIOPSY IN GUIDING MICRODISSECTION TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION IN NON-OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA: A SINGLE-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Shah, J.
    Fidel, M. G.
    Bal, D. S.
    Roque, C.
    Ko, Y.
    Patel, P.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [32] Predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed mTESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Long-term experience at a single institute
    Yucel, Cem
    Budak, Salih
    Keskin, Mehmet Zeynel
    Kisa, Erdem
    Kozacioglu, Zafer
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2018, 90 (02) : 136 - 140
  • [33] Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE): Predictive value of preoperative hormonal levels and pathology in non-obstructive azoospermia
    Eken, Alper
    Gulec, Feray
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 34 (02): : 103 - 108
  • [34] Successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction despite high serum follicle stimulating hormone levels in men with non-obstructive azoospermia
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Lin, Kathleen
    Schlegel, Peter N.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 654 - 654
  • [35] Factors associated with undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction among men with non-obstructive azoospermia following evaluation by a reproductive urologist
    Greenberg, Daniel R.
    Stanisic, Alexander V.
    Pham, Minh N.
    Hudnall, Matthew T.
    Brannigan, Robert E.
    Ambulkar, Siddhant S.
    Fantus, Richard J.
    Halpern, Joshua A.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2023, 12 (07) : 1062 - 1070
  • [36] Factors anticipating difficulty in testicular sperm extraction and their influence on schedule planning and surgical technique in non-obstructive azoospermic patients.
    Amer, MK
    Ateyah, A
    Zohdy, W
    Abdelnasser, T
    Fakhry, E
    Abdelmalak, G
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (03) : S242 - S242
  • [37] Oocyte cryopreservation following failed testicular sperm extraction: a French case report with implications for the management of non-obstructive azoospermia
    Grynberg, Michael
    Hesters, Laetitia
    Thubert, Thibault
    Izard, Vincent
    Fanchin, Renato
    Frydman, Rene
    Frydman, Nelly
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 24 (06) : 611 - 613
  • [38] MicroRNA profile comparison of testicular tissues derived from successful and unsuccessful microdissection testicular sperm extraction retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia patients
    Fang, Na
    Cao, Congcong
    Wen, Yujiao
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Yuan, Shuiqiao
    Huang, Xunbin
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (04) : 671 - 682
  • [39] Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?
    Caroppo, Ettore
    Colpi, Giovanni Maria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (23)
  • [40] Successful pregnancy and delivery following microdissection testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-obstructive azoospermia after microsurgical varicocelectomy: A case report and review of the literature
    Kamo, Hisae
    Komiya, Akira
    Ota, Kuniaki
    Hiraoka, Kenichiro
    Honma, Koichi
    Kawai, Kiyotaka
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (09) : 1732 - 1736