Superficial dose evaluation of four dose calculation algorithms

被引:14
|
作者
Cao, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Xiaoyu [2 ]
Yang, Zhen [2 ]
Qiu, Xiaoping [1 ]
Lv, Zhiping [2 ]
Lei, Mingjun [2 ]
Liu, Gui [2 ]
Zhang, Zijian [2 ]
Hu, Yongmei [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South China, Sch Nucl Sci & Technol, Hengyang 421000, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Oncol Dept, Changsha 410000, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Superficial dose; Skin dose; Algorithm; Monte Carlo simulation; Film; MONTE-CARLO; PHOTON BEAMS; RADIATION TREATMENT; RADIOCHROMIC FILM; RADIOTHERAPY; DOSIMETRY; IMPLEMENTATION; CARCINOMA; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.02.032
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Accurate superficial dose calculation is of major importance because of the skin toxicity in radiotherapy, especially within the initial 2 mm depth being considered more clinically relevant. The aim of this study is to evaluate superficial dose calculation accuracy of four commonly used algorithms in commercially available treatment planning systems (TPS) by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and film measurements. The superficial dose in a simple geometrical phantom with size of 30 cm x 30 cm x 30 cm was calculated by PBC (Pencil Beam Convolution), AAA (Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm), AXB (Acuros XB) in Eclipse system and CCC (Collapsed Cone Convolution) in Raystation system under the conditions of source to surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm and field size (FS) of 10 x 10 cm(2). EGSnrc (BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc) program was performed to simulate the central axis dose distribution of Varian Trilogy accelerator, combined with measurements of superficial dose distribution by an extrapolation method of multilayer radiochromic films, to estimate the dose calculation accuracy of four algorithms in the superficial region which was recommended in detail by the ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement) and the ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). In superficial region, good agreement was achieved between MC simulation and film extrapolation method, with the mean differences less than 1%, 2% and 5% for 0, 30 degrees and 60 degrees, respectively. The relative skin dose errors were 0.84%, 1.88% and 3.90%; the mean dose discrepancies (0, 30 and 60) between each of four algorithms and MC simulation were (2.41 +/- 1.55%, +/- 3.11 2.40%, and 1.53 +/- 1.05%), (3.09 +/- 3.00%, 3.10 +/- 3.01%, and 3.77 +/- 3.59%), (3.16 +/- 1.50%, 8.70 +/- 2.84%, and 18.20 +/- 4.10%) and (14.45 +/- 4.66%, 10.74 +/- 4.54%, and 334 +/- 3.26%) for AXB, CCC, AAA and PBC respectively. Monte Carlo simulation verified the feasibility of the superficial dose measurements by multilayer Gafchromic films. And the rank of superficial dose calculation accuracy of four algorithms was AXB > CCC > AAA > PBC. Care should be taken when using the AAA and PBC algorithms in the superficial dose calculation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the influence of contoured tops for different dose calculation algorithms in treatment planning
    Schneider, F.
    Bauer, L.
    Stieler, F.
    Lohr, F.
    Wenz, F.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 186 : 101 - 101
  • [22] Evaluation of 6 proton dose calculation algorithms using a critical experimental phantom
    Sorriaux, J.
    Testa, M.
    Souris, K.
    Orban De Xivry, J.
    Lee, J. A.
    Bertrand, D.
    Traneus, E.
    Paganetti, H.
    Vynckier, S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S455 - S456
  • [23] Evaluation of IMRT Dose Calculation Based On Pencil-Beam and AAA Algorithms
    Yuan, Y.
    Duan, J.
    Popple, R.
    Brezovich, I.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3829 - 3829
  • [24] Comparing dose calculation algorithms in low dose regions for patients with brain metastases
    Alahmar, M., I
    Wolfs, C.
    Temel, Y.
    Eekers, D.
    Verhaegen, F.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S743 - S744
  • [25] Dosimetric Impact of Four Dose Calculation Algorithms On Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer
    Kusunoki, T.
    Kurooka, M.
    Nonaka, T.
    Yoshino, S.
    Shioiri, K.
    Ide, S.
    Nakayama, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2967 - 2967
  • [26] Accuracy of Superficial Dose Calculation for Breast Cancer Treatments on Tomotherapy
    Green, O. Pechenaya
    Goddu, S.
    Rodriguez, V.
    Cates, J.
    Michaletz-Lorenz, M.
    Zoberi, I.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [27] Evaluation of the Independent Dose Calculation Algorithm
    Laurikaitiene, J.
    Laurikaitis, M.
    Adliene, D.
    Adlys, G. A.
    Raila, S.
    Nordstrom, J.
    Back, S.
    Mansson, S.
    [J]. 14TH NORDIC-BALTIC CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 20 : 574 - +
  • [28] Clinical Evaluation of Dose Calculation Algorithms in Stereotactic Radiation Therapy fo Lung Cancer
    Tomiyama, Y.
    Araki, F.
    Ono, T.
    Hioki, K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [29] Evaluation of tangential breast treatment plans using two different dose calculation algorithms
    King, S
    Jeswani, S
    Krasin, MJ
    Dogan, N
    Sethi, A
    Emami, B
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 201 - 201
  • [30] An Evaluation Study of Dose Calculation Algorithms for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Heterogeneous Phantom
    Shosha, M.
    Deiab, N.
    Eldib, A.
    Tohamy, K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3808 - 3808