Cost-Utility Analysis of Gastric Bypass for Severely Obese Patients in Spain

被引:16
|
作者
Castilla, Ivan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Mar, Javier [1 ,3 ]
Valcarcel-Nazco, Cristina [2 ,4 ]
Arrospide, Arantzazu [1 ,3 ]
Ramos-Goni, Juan M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Serv Res Chron Patients Network REDISSEC, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[2] Univ La Laguna, Ctr Biomed Res Canary Isl, E-38207 San Cristobal la Laguna, Spain
[3] Alto Deba Hosp, Clin Management Serv, Arrasate Mondragon, Spain
[4] Canary Isl Fdn Hlth & Res FUNCIS, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[5] Canary Isl Hlth Serv SESCS, HTA Unit, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
关键词
Cost-utility; Discrete-event simulation; Gastric bypass; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BARIATRIC SURGERY; RISK; MORTALITY; COMORBIDITIES; SURVIVAL; WEIGHT; STROKE; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-014-1304-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To assess the cost-utility of gastric bypass versus usual care for patients with severe obesity in Spain. Methods We have implemented a discrete-event simulation model with two branches: one branch involves gastric bypass, thereby reducing patients' BMI, and another branch where patients do not undergo surgery. The model analyzes the emergence of comorbidities (stroke, coronary obstructive disease, diabetes, and breast cancer) associated with obesity during a lifetime horizon. The selected measure of effectiveness is health-related quality of life. Both costs and effects are discounted at 3 %. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis is also performed using second-order Monte Carlo simulation; acceptability curves for different time horizons were also calculated. Results Patients with gastric bypass result in a lifetime increase of 5.63 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (18.18 vs. 12.55 QALYs). In addition, because of the reduced spending associated with the treatment of various obesity-related comorbidities, final savings stand at 13,994 (sic). The total cost of the intervention branch is close to half the cost of the nonintervention branch (17,431 vs. 31,425 (sic)). Conclusions Gastric bypass is an intervention that dominates over the option of not intervening when a lifetime horizon is considered.
引用
收藏
页码:2061 / 2068
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in severely obese patients
    Panagiotis Lainas
    Radwan Kassir
    Marine Benois
    Joseph Derienne
    Tarek Debs
    Maissa Safieddine
    Jean Gugenheim
    Ibrahim Dagher
    Imed Ben Amor
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 891 - 898
  • [42] Economic cost-utility analysis of stage-directed gastric cancer treatment
    Powell, Arfon G.
    Wheat, Jennifer R.
    Eley, Catherine
    Robinson, David
    Roberts, Stuart A.
    Lewis, Wyn
    BJS OPEN, 2021, 5 (06):
  • [43] Cost-utility analysis of imrecoxib compared with diclofenac for patients with osteoarthritis
    Xueshan Sun
    Xuemei Zhen
    Xiaoqian Hu
    Yuanyuan Li
    ShuYan Gu
    Yuxuan Gu
    Zixuan Zhao
    Wei Yang
    Hengjin Dong
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 19
  • [44] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF CANCER CARE
    OESER, H
    KOEPPE, P
    MUNCHENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1984, 126 (09): : A38 - &
  • [45] An instrumentalist critique of ''cost-utility analysis''
    Hildred, W
    Beauvais, F
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 1995, 29 (04) : 1083 - 1096
  • [46] Decision Modeling for Cost-Utility Analysis
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (06) : 700 - 701
  • [47] Cost-utility analysis for statins in Mexico
    Quevedo, MJF
    Contreras, I
    Nevarez, A
    García-Contreras, F
    Constantino-Casas, P
    Garduño, J
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 269 - 269
  • [48] A cost-utility analysis of therapy for amblyopia
    Membreno, JH
    Brown, MM
    Brown, GC
    Sharma, S
    Beauchamp, GR
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (12) : 2265 - 2271
  • [49] Cost-utility analysis, the pearl in the crown
    Brown, Melissa M.
    Brown, Gary C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2010, 45 (03): : 211 - 212
  • [50] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS AND PHYSICAL THERAPY
    KARHAUSEN, R
    WEBERFALKENSAMMER, H
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 1982, 41 (04): : 183 - 183