Assessment of Occupational Hearing Loss Associated With Non-Gaussian Noise Using the Kurtosis-Adjusted Cumulative Noise Exposure Metric: A Cross-Sectional Survey

被引:5
|
作者
Shi, Zhihao [1 ]
Wang, Xin [2 ]
Gao, Xiangjing [3 ]
Xie, Hongwei [3 ]
Zhou, Lifang [3 ]
Zhang, Meibian [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ, Sch Med, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Occupat Hlth & Poison Control, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Occupat Hlth & Radiat Protect Inst, Zhejiang Prov Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
kurtosis; non-Gaussian noise; hearing loss; cumulative noise exposure; manufacturing workers; ENERGY; RISK; WORKERS; APPLICABILITY; INTERMITTENT; HAZARD; CHINA;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870312
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThere is little literature on the validity of kurtosis-adjusted noise energy metrics in human studies. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the application of cumulative noise exposure (CNE) adjusted by kurtosis in evaluating occupational hearing loss associated with non-Gaussian noise among manufacturing workers. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted on 1,558 manufacturing workers exposed to noise from five industries to collect noise exposure and hearing loss data. Both CNE and kurtosis-adjusted CNE (CNE ') were collapsed into 2-dB(A)center dot year bins, and the mean noise-induced permanent threshold shifts at 3, 4, and 6 kHz (NIPTS346) in each bin were calculated. The contributions of CNE and CNE ' to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) were compared using the multiple linear regression. The degree of overlap of two linear regression equations (i.e., between CNE ' and NIPTS346 for non-Gaussian noise and between CNE and NIPTS346 for Gaussian noise) was used to evaluate the validity of the CNE ' using a stratified analysis based on age and sex. ResultsMultiple linear regression models showed that after kurtosis adjustment, the standardized regression coefficient of CNE increased from 0.230 to 0.255, and R-2 increased from 0.147 to 0.153. The linear relationship between NIPTS346 and CNE ' or CNE showed that the regression line of non-Gaussian noise was closer to that of Gaussian noise when using CNE ' than using CNE. The mean difference in NIPTS346 between the equations of non-Gaussian noise and Gaussian noise was significantly reduced from 4.32 to 1.63 dB HL after kurtosis adjustment (t = 12.00, p < 0.001). Through a stratified analysis, these significant decreases were observed in male and female workers, and workers aged >= 30 years old. ConclusionAs a noise exposure metric combining noise energy and temporal characteristics, the kurtosis-adjusted-CNE metric was more effective than CNE alone in assessing occupational hearing loss among manufacturing workers in non-Gaussian noise environment. However, more studies are needed to verify the validity of the kurtosis-adjusted-CNE metric.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Hearing Loss Characteristics of Workers with Hypertension Exposed to Occupational Noise: A Cross-Sectional Study of 270,033 Participants
    Wang, Boshen
    Han, Lei
    Dai, Simin
    Li, Xiuting
    Cai, Wenyan
    Yang, Dandan
    Chen, Lin
    Wang, Ning
    Zhu, Baoli
    Zhang, Juan
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [22] Analysis on Risk Factors of Depressive Symptoms in Occupational Noise-induced Hearing Loss Patients: A Cross-sectional Study
    Deng, Xiao-Feng
    Shi, Guo-Qi
    Guo, Li-Li
    Zhu, Chuan-An
    Chen, Yong-Jun
    NOISE & HEALTH, 2019, 21 (98): : 17 - 24
  • [23] Associations of Occupational Heat Stress and Noise Exposure with Carotid Atherosclerosis among Chinese Steelworkers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Wang, Lihua
    Yu, Miao
    Zhang, Shengkui
    Li, Xiaoming
    Yuan, Juxiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [24] Noise-induced hearing loss An examination of the methods of assessment in a cross-sectional study of 87 industrial workers
    Das, S.
    Mulheran, M.
    Brewster, M.
    Banerjee, A. R.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 43 (02) : 591 - 597
  • [25] Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding basic school noise exposure and hearing loss among teachers: A cross-sectional study
    Osei, Francis Acheampong
    Sulemana, Alhassan
    Sackey, Lyndon Nii Adjiri
    Effah, Esther Asantewaa
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 11 (04): : 391 - 398
  • [26] Association of sleep duration and noise exposure with hearing loss among Chinese and American adults: two cross-sectional studies
    Wu, E.
    Ni, Juntao
    Zhu, Zhaohui
    Xu, Hongquan
    Ci, Jun
    Tao, Lin
    Xie, Tian
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [27] Risk factors associated with occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos: A cross-sectional epidemiologic investigation
    Arnold, Michelle L.
    Sanchez, Victoria A.
    Carrasco, Danielle Nichole
    Martinez, Diane
    Dhar, Sumitrajit
    Stickel, Ariana
    Perreira, Krista M.
    Athanasios, Tsalatsanis
    Lee, David J.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2023, 20 (12) : 586 - 597
  • [28] Occupational noise exposure assessment using O*NET and its application to a study of hearing loss in the US general population
    Choi, Yoon-Hyeong
    Hu, Howard
    Tak, SangWoo
    Mukherjee, Bhramar
    Park, Sung Kyun
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2012, 69 (03) : 176 - 183
  • [29] The Combined Effect of Elevated Blood Pressure and Occupational Noise Exposure on Bilateral High-Frequency Hearing Loss Evidence From a Large Sample Cross-sectional Study
    Zhang, Hua-Dong
    Yuan, Fang
    Jin, Nan
    Deng, Hua-Xin
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 65 (04) : E219 - E226
  • [30] Epidemiology of the extent of recreational noise exposure and hearing protection use: cross-sectional survey in a nationally representative UK adult population sample
    Armitage, Christopher J.
    Loughran, Michael T.
    Munro, Kevin J.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)