Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?

被引:48
|
作者
Muller, Oliver [1 ,5 ]
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon [1 ,2 ]
Carreiras, Manuel [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ La Laguna, Inst Tecnol Biomed, E-38207 San Cristobal la Laguna, Spain
[2] BCBL, Basque Ctr Cognit Brain & Language, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
[3] Univ Pais Vasco UPV EHU, Fac Filol Vasca, Vitoria, Spain
[4] Basque Fdn Sci, IKERBASQUE, Bilbao, Spain
[5] Univ Rosario, Psychol Program, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
Visual word recognition; Semantic representation; Association; Orthographic neighbors; Language; ERP; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; LEXICAL DECISION; SCALP DISTRIBUTIONS; SEMANTIC AMBIGUITY; FREQUENCY; INFORMATION; ACTIVATION; SIMILARITY; ACCESS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00960.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Words with many orthographic neighbors elicit a larger N400 than words with few orthographic neighbors. This has been interpreted as stronger overall semantic activation due to orthographic neighbors activating their semantic representations. To investigate this claim, we manipulated the number of associates of words (NoA), a variable directly affecting overall semantic activation, and compared this to the ERP effect of the number of orthographic neighbors (N) in a lexical decision task. Words with high NoA and with high N produced a very similar increase of the N400. In addition, a higher N increased the amplitude of the Late Positive Complex. The common N400 effect suggests that N affects semantic activation, like NoA does. The late positive effect specific to N could occur because words with few orthographic neighbors initially elicit little activity in the orthographic system, thereby resembling nonwords, which leads to distinct processing.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 466
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What is shared in a social representation?
    Huerta, Jose Alfredo Lopez
    Romo, Rocio Angelica Gonzalez
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2011, 10 (04): : 526 - 527
  • [42] Shared decision making in preventive health care What it is; what it is not
    Grad, Roland
    Legare, France
    Bell, Neil R.
    Dickinson, James A.
    Singh, Harminder
    Moore, Ainsley Elizabeth
    Kasperavicius, Danielle
    Kretschmer, Kaylyn L.
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2017, 63 (09)
  • [43] WHAT ORTHOGRAPHIC SKILLS ARE TAUGHT BY SEVEN UPPER PRIMARYTEACHERS?
    Villeneuve-Lapointe, Myriam
    Moreau, Andre C.
    Blain, Sylvie
    MCGILL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2022, 57 (03): : 101 - 116
  • [44] Enemies and friends in the neighborhood: Orthographic similarity effects in semantic categorization
    Pecher, D
    Zeelenberg, R
    Wagenmakers, EJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2005, 31 (01) : 121 - 128
  • [45] Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in Recognition and Recall Tasks in a Transparent Orthography
    Justi, Francis R. R.
    Jaeger, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (04) : 565 - 578
  • [46] The Role of Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in Chinese Word Recognition
    Meng-Feng Li
    Wei-Chun Lin
    Tai-Li Chou
    Fu-Ling Yang
    Jei-Tun Wu
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2015, 44 : 219 - 236
  • [47] Task modulates ERP effects of orthographic neighborhood for pseudowords but not words
    Meade, Gabriela
    Grainger, Jonathan
    Holcomb, Phillip J.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2019, 129 : 385 - 396
  • [48] Effects of baseword frequency and orthographic neighborhood size in pseudohomophone naming
    Grainger, J
    Spinelli, E
    Ferrand, L
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 42 (01) : 88 - 102
  • [49] Effects of lexical skills and orthographic neighborhood size in word memory
    Ballot, Claire
    Robert, Christelle
    Dujardin, Emilie
    Mathey, Stephanie
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2024, 52 (03) : 610 - 621
  • [50] The Role of Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in Chinese Word Recognition
    Li, Meng-Feng
    Lin, Wei-Chun
    Chou, Tai-Li
    Yang, Fu-Ling
    Wu, Jei-Tun
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 44 (03) : 219 - 236