Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?

被引:48
|
作者
Muller, Oliver [1 ,5 ]
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon [1 ,2 ]
Carreiras, Manuel [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ La Laguna, Inst Tecnol Biomed, E-38207 San Cristobal la Laguna, Spain
[2] BCBL, Basque Ctr Cognit Brain & Language, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
[3] Univ Pais Vasco UPV EHU, Fac Filol Vasca, Vitoria, Spain
[4] Basque Fdn Sci, IKERBASQUE, Bilbao, Spain
[5] Univ Rosario, Psychol Program, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
Visual word recognition; Semantic representation; Association; Orthographic neighbors; Language; ERP; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; LEXICAL DECISION; SCALP DISTRIBUTIONS; SEMANTIC AMBIGUITY; FREQUENCY; INFORMATION; ACTIVATION; SIMILARITY; ACCESS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00960.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Words with many orthographic neighbors elicit a larger N400 than words with few orthographic neighbors. This has been interpreted as stronger overall semantic activation due to orthographic neighbors activating their semantic representations. To investigate this claim, we manipulated the number of associates of words (NoA), a variable directly affecting overall semantic activation, and compared this to the ERP effect of the number of orthographic neighbors (N) in a lexical decision task. Words with high NoA and with high N produced a very similar increase of the N400. In addition, a higher N increased the amplitude of the Late Positive Complex. The common N400 effect suggests that N affects semantic activation, like NoA does. The late positive effect specific to N could occur because words with few orthographic neighbors initially elicit little activity in the orthographic system, thereby resembling nonwords, which leads to distinct processing.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 466
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Associative and Orthographic Neighborhood Density Effects in Normal Aging and Alzheimer's Disease
    Dunabeitia, Jon Andoni
    Marin, Alejandro
    Carreiras, Manuel
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 23 (06) : 759 - 764
  • [2] Orthographic neighborhood size effects and associative recognition
    Glanc, Gina A.
    Greene, Robert L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 122 (01): : 53 - 62
  • [3] Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming
    van Heuven, WJB
    Dijkstra, T
    Grainger, J
    Schriefers, H
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2001, 8 (01) : 96 - 101
  • [4] Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming
    Walter J. B. Van Heuven
    Ton Dijkstra
    Jonathan Grainger
    Herbert Schriefers
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2001, 8 : 96 - 101
  • [5] Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: The effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size
    Siakaluk, PD
    Sears, CR
    Lupker, SJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2002, 28 (03) : 661 - 681
  • [6] What Is Orthographic Knowledge?
    Apel, Kenn
    LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2011, 42 (04) : 592 - 603
  • [7] Orthographic neighborhood density modulates the size of transposed-letter priming effects
    Gabriela Meade
    Cécile Mahnich
    Phillip J. Holcomb
    Jonathan Grainger
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2021, 21 : 948 - 959
  • [8] WHAT NEIGHBORHOOD
    MERCER, C
    NEW SOCIETY, 1976, 35 (694): : 154 - 156
  • [9] WHAT IS A NEIGHBORHOOD
    HOJNACKI, WP
    SOCIAL POLICY, 1979, 10 (02) : 47 - 52
  • [10] Children like dense neighborhoods: Orthographic Neighborhood density effects in novel readers
    Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon
    Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 11 (01): : 26 - 35