The ALCCaS Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer

被引:41
|
作者
McCombie, Andrew M. [1 ]
Frizelle, Frank [1 ]
Bagshaw, Philip Frederick [1 ]
Frampton, Chris M. [2 ]
Hewett, Peter J. [3 ,4 ]
McMurrick, Paul John [5 ,6 ]
Rieger, Nicholas [3 ,4 ]
Solomon, Michael J. [7 ]
Stevenson, Andrew R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Surg, POB 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Div Surg, Woodville South, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Malvern, Vic, Australia
[6] Cabrini Hosp, Malvern, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Surg Outcomes Res Ctr SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Herston, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Colonic resection; Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopic; Quality of life; Randomized controlled trial; OPEN SURGICAL TREATMENTS; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OPEN SURGERY; RECTAL-CANCER; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001165
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: This study reports the quality-of-life assessment of the ALCCaS trial. The ALCCaS trial compared laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. It reported equivalence of survival at 5 years. Quality of life was measured as a secondary outcome. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report on the quality of life data of the ALCCaS Trial. DESIGN: This study reports a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic with open colonic resection. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in Australasia. PATIENTS: Patients with a single adenocarcinoma of the right, left, or sigmoid colon, presenting for elective treatment, were eligible for randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Open and laparoscopic colonic resections were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient symptoms and quality of life were measured using the Symptoms Distress Scale, the Quality of Life Index, and the Global Quality of Life Score preoperatively, and at 2 days, 2 weeks, and 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients enrolled in ALCCaS, 425 completed at least 1 quality-of-life measure at 4 time points (71.8% of cohort). Those who received the laparoscopic intervention had better quality of life postoperatively in terms of the Symptoms Distress Scale (p < 0.01), Quality of Life Index (p < 0.01), and Global Quality of Life (p < 0.01). In intention-to-treat analyses, those assigned to laparoscopic surgery had a better quality of life postoperatively in terms of the Symptoms Distress Scale (p < 0.01) and Quality of Life Index (p < 0.01), whereas Global Quality of Life was not significant (p = 0.056). The subscales better for laparoscopic resection at all 3 postoperative time points were appetite, insomnia, pain, fatigue, bowel, daily living, and health (p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: The primary limitation was the different response rates for the 3 quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSIONS: There was a short-term gain in quality of life maintained at 2 months postsurgery for those who received laparoscopic relative to open colonic resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A691.
引用
收藏
页码:1156 / 1162
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Association of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy on the Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life of Colon Cancer Survivors
    Thong, Melissa
    Jansen, Lina
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    Brenner, Hermann
    Arndt, Volker
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 43 : 155 - 155
  • [42] Association of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy on the long-term health-related quality of life of colon cancer survivors
    Thong, Melissa S. Y.
    Jansen, Lina
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    Brenner, Hermann
    Arndt, Volker
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (12): : 5593 - 5603
  • [43] Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Mohapatra, Kailash Chandra
    Swain, Narendranath
    Patro, Srikant
    Sahoo, Ashok Kumar
    Sahoo, Ashish Kumar
    Mishra, Ashish Kumar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (03)
  • [44] Long-term Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Single-incision Versus Multi-port Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colon Cancer
    Watanabe, Jun
    Ishibe, Atsushi
    Suwa, Hirokazu
    Ota, Mitsuyoshi
    Fujii, Shoichi
    Kubota, Kazumi
    Kunisaki, Chikara
    Endo, Itaru
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 273 (06) : 1060 - 1065
  • [45] Effect of Daikenchuto (TJ-100) on gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Hoshino, Nobuaki
    Kawada, Kenji
    Hida, Koya
    Wada, Toshiaki
    Takahashi, Ryo
    Yoshitomi, Mami
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [46] Effect of Daikenchuto (TJ-100) on gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Nobuaki Hoshino
    Kenji Kawada
    Koya Hida
    Toshiaki Wada
    Ryo Takahashi
    Mami Yoshitomi
    Yoshiharu Sakai
    Trials, 18
  • [47] Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial
    S. Celarier
    S. Monziols
    M. O. Francois
    V. Assenat
    P. Carles
    M. Capdepont
    C. Fleming
    E. Rullier
    G. Napolitano
    Q. Denost
    Trials, 21
  • [48] Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial
    Celarier, S.
    Monziols, S.
    Francois, M. O.
    Assenat, V.
    Carles, P.
    Capdepont, M.
    Fleming, C.
    Rullier, E.
    Napolitano, G.
    Denost, Q.
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [49] Randomized controlled trial of bisacodyl suppository versus placebo for postoperative ileus after elective colectomy for colon cancer
    Wiriyakosol, Sukanya
    Kongdan, Youwanuch
    Euanorasetr, Chakrapan
    Wacharachaisurapol, Noppadol
    Lertsithichai, Panuwat
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 30 (03) : 167 - 172
  • [50] Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in a Laparoscopic Naive Center
    Fadlalla, Waleed Mohamed
    Hanafy, Ayman
    Abdelhakim, Mahmoud
    Aboulkassem, Hatem
    Ashraf, El Sayed
    Abdelbary, Ahmed
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2021, 2021