The ALCCaS Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer

被引:41
|
作者
McCombie, Andrew M. [1 ]
Frizelle, Frank [1 ]
Bagshaw, Philip Frederick [1 ]
Frampton, Chris M. [2 ]
Hewett, Peter J. [3 ,4 ]
McMurrick, Paul John [5 ,6 ]
Rieger, Nicholas [3 ,4 ]
Solomon, Michael J. [7 ]
Stevenson, Andrew R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Surg, POB 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Div Surg, Woodville South, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Malvern, Vic, Australia
[6] Cabrini Hosp, Malvern, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Surg Outcomes Res Ctr SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Herston, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Colonic resection; Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopic; Quality of life; Randomized controlled trial; OPEN SURGICAL TREATMENTS; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OPEN SURGERY; RECTAL-CANCER; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001165
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: This study reports the quality-of-life assessment of the ALCCaS trial. The ALCCaS trial compared laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. It reported equivalence of survival at 5 years. Quality of life was measured as a secondary outcome. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report on the quality of life data of the ALCCaS Trial. DESIGN: This study reports a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic with open colonic resection. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in Australasia. PATIENTS: Patients with a single adenocarcinoma of the right, left, or sigmoid colon, presenting for elective treatment, were eligible for randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Open and laparoscopic colonic resections were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient symptoms and quality of life were measured using the Symptoms Distress Scale, the Quality of Life Index, and the Global Quality of Life Score preoperatively, and at 2 days, 2 weeks, and 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients enrolled in ALCCaS, 425 completed at least 1 quality-of-life measure at 4 time points (71.8% of cohort). Those who received the laparoscopic intervention had better quality of life postoperatively in terms of the Symptoms Distress Scale (p < 0.01), Quality of Life Index (p < 0.01), and Global Quality of Life (p < 0.01). In intention-to-treat analyses, those assigned to laparoscopic surgery had a better quality of life postoperatively in terms of the Symptoms Distress Scale (p < 0.01) and Quality of Life Index (p < 0.01), whereas Global Quality of Life was not significant (p = 0.056). The subscales better for laparoscopic resection at all 3 postoperative time points were appetite, insomnia, pain, fatigue, bowel, daily living, and health (p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: The primary limitation was the different response rates for the 3 quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSIONS: There was a short-term gain in quality of life maintained at 2 months postsurgery for those who received laparoscopic relative to open colonic resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A691.
引用
收藏
页码:1156 / 1162
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ASSESSING QUALITY OF LIFE FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC-ASSISTED VERSUS OPEN COLECTOMY FOR COLON CANCER.
    Frizelle, F.
    Mccombie, A.
    Frampton, C.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (06) : E432 - E433
  • [2] Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer
    Hasegawa, H
    Kabeshima, Y
    Watanabe, M
    Yamamoto, S
    Kitajima, M
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (04): : 636 - 640
  • [3] Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer
    H. Hasegawa
    Y. Kabeshima
    M. Watanabe
    S. Yamamoto
    M. Kitajima
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 : 636 - 640
  • [4] Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer - A randomized trial
    Weeks, JC
    Nelson, H
    Gelber, S
    Sargent, D
    Schroeder, G
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (03): : 321 - 328
  • [5] A prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open colectomy for cancer: 10 year follow-up
    Geisler, DP
    Milsom, J
    Hull, TL
    Marcello, P
    Hammel, J
    Brady, K
    Fazio, VW
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (05) : 720 - 720
  • [6] Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy - A randomized controlled trial
    Chung, Chi Chiu
    Ng, Dennis Chung Kei
    Tsang, Wilson Wen Chieng
    Tang, Wai Lun
    Yau, Kevin Kwok Kay
    Cheung, Hester Yui Shan
    Wong, James Cheuk Hoo
    Li, Michael Ka Wah
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (05) : 728 - 733
  • [7] Short-Term Outcomes of the Australasian Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatments for Colon Cancer The ALCCaS Trial
    Hewett, Peter J.
    Allardyce, Randall A.
    Bagshaw, Philip F.
    Frampton, Christopher M.
    Frizelle, Francis A.
    Rieger, Nicholas A.
    Smith, J. Shona
    Solomon, Michael J.
    Stephens, Jacqueline H.
    Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (05) : 728 - 738
  • [8] Laparoscopic Assisted Colectomy (LAC) for colon cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Lacy, AM
    Delgado, S
    Castells, A
    Pera, M
    Garcia-Valdecasas, JC
    Pique, JM
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A35 - A35
  • [9] COLORA randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer
    E. J. Hazebroek
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2002, 16 : 949 - 953
  • [10] COLOR - A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer
    Hazebroek, EJ
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (06): : 949 - 953