Quantifying Geological Uncertainty Using Conditioned Spatial Markov Chains

被引:0
|
作者
Oluwatuyi, Opeyemi E. [1 ]
Rajapakshage, Rasika [2 ]
Wulff, Shaun S. [2 ]
Ng, Kam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Dept Math & Stat, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
Conditional simulation; Geostatistics; Geomaterial type; Site investigation; Transition rate matrix; SPMC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Geological uncertainty is the changeability due to one geomaterial embedded in another, particularly at the boundaries between the different geomaterial layers. Spatial Markov Chains (spMC) and information entropy were used in this study to simulate subsurface geomaterials and to quantify geological uncertainty in two dimensions (2D) based upon spare borehole data. The proposed methods were illustrated using a bridge site in Wyoming. Results showed that the multinomial categorical simulation (MCS) model provided more accurate description of geomaterials as measured by an uncertainty quantification of 0.006 and a confidence ratio of 91.9%. The reduction of geological uncertainty does not always imply the need for additional boreholes when data are available from boreholes that are well-spaced within the site. However, if there is need for additional boreholes, optimized locations to reduce uncertainty can be determined. Thus, the proposed approach could also serve as a guide for designing a site investigation plan.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 445
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantifying and Managing Uncertainty in Piecewise-Deterministic Markov Processes
    Cartee, Elliot
    Farah, Antonio
    Nellis, April
    Van Hook, Jacob
    Vladimirsky, Alexander
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2023, 11 (03): : 814 - 847
  • [22] MARKOV RANDOM FIELD MODELS FOR QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY IN SUBSURFACE REMEDIATION
    Kaluza, M. Clara De Paolis
    Miller, Eric L.
    Abriola, Linda M.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2015, : 4296 - 4299
  • [23] Policy-Conditioned Uncertainty Sets for Robust Markov Decision Processes
    Tirinzoni, Andrea
    Chen, Xiangli
    Petrik, Marek
    Ziebart, Brian D.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31
  • [24] A Markov chain model for quantifying consumer risk in food supply chains
    Teasley, Raquel
    Bemley, Jessye
    Davis, Lauren B.
    Erera, Alan
    Chang, Yanling
    HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2016, 5 (02) : 149 - 161
  • [25] The role of geologists in assessing and quantifying geological uncertainty in the conversion of mineral reserves
    Berry, M.
    5TH INTERNATIONAL MINING GEOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2003, 2003 (08): : 49 - 60
  • [26] Spatial Mixing and Non-local Markov chains
    Blanca, Antonio
    Caputo, Pietro
    Sinclair, Alistair
    Vigoda, Eric
    SODA'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2018, : 1965 - 1980
  • [27] MULTIPLY CONNECTED MARKOV-CHAINS AS SPATIAL MATRICES
    YANSHIN, VV
    DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1991, 318 (05): : 1108 - 1112
  • [28] Smoothed Estimators for Markov Chains with Sparse Spatial Observations
    Kang, Wei
    Rey, Sergio J.
    GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 53 (02) : 307 - 328
  • [29] Geological risk prediction under uncertainty in tunnel excavation using online learning and hidden Markov model
    Zhang, Limao
    Wang, Ying
    Fu, Xianlei
    Song, Xieqing
    Lin, Penghui
    FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [30] Simulation of Geological Uncertainty Using Coupled Markov Chain: A Case Study at a Manually Filled Loess Site
    Zhang, Yanjie
    Ren, Xuezhi
    Wang, Xu
    Zhu, Hanxing
    Jiang, Daijun
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2024, 10 (02):