Sexual segregation in Eurasian wild sheep

被引:26
|
作者
Singh, Navinder J. [1 ,2 ]
Bonenfant, Christophe [3 ]
Yoccoz, Nigel G. [1 ]
Cote, Steeve D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Dept Biol, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[2] Nat Conservat Fdn, Mysore 570002, Karnataka, India
[3] UCB Lyon 1, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, LBBE Biometrie & Biol Evolut, CNRS,UMR 5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[4] Univ Laval, Dept Biol, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[5] Univ Laval, Ctr Etud Nord, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
关键词
activity budget; habitat; Ovis; predation risk; social segregation; ACTIVITY-BUDGET HYPOTHESIS; WHITE-TAILED DEER; HABITAT SELECTION; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; BODY-SIZE; DIMORPHISM; PREDATION; RESPONSES; SPACE; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/arp205
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Sexual segregation, a widely observed phenomenon in vertebrates, is commonly categorized into habitat and social segregation. A universal explanation for sexual segregation is, however, lacking and debated. Causes of segregation and their division into proximate and ultimate causes is also highly debated, and the relative contributions of habitat and social factors to segregation are also seldom quantified. We studied the Eurasian wild sheep in trans-Himalayan rangelands to identify these causes and estimate the contributions of habitat and social components to sexual segregation. We observed male, lactating, and nonlactating female groups feeding during 3 springs and summers. The 3 groups strongly segregated and differed in their activity budgets, partly because of antipredation risks, with lactating females being the most vigilant (40% of the time). At the feeding habitat scale, males selected the patches of highest quality. We found that the social component contributed the most to segregation (70%) as compared with habitat segregation (30%). This is the first study that quantifies the contribution of habitat and social components to sexual segregation. We emphasize the role of antipredator behavior of lactating females on activity budgets and selection of relatively poor-quality sites as compared with other groups and illustrate that the usual division into proximal and ultimate causes of sexual segregation is not as clear-cut as usually presented.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 418
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sexual segregation in ungulates: A comment
    Gross, JE
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1998, 79 (04) : 1404 - 1409
  • [32] SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN ALASKAN MOOSE
    MIQUELLE, DG
    PEEK, JM
    VANBALLENBERGHE, V
    WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS, 1992, (122) : 1 - 57
  • [33] Relationship between predation-risk factors and sexual segregation in Dall's sheep (Ovis dalli dalli)
    Corti, P
    Shackleton, DM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2002, 80 (12) : 2108 - 2117
  • [34] Early differentiation of male and female interactive behaviour as a possible mechanism for sexual segregation in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini)
    Guilhem, Colette
    Bideau, Eric
    Gerard, Jean-François
    Maublanc, Marie-Line
    Pépin, Dominique
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2006, 98 (1-2) : 54 - 69
  • [35] Fatal adiaspiromycosis in a wild Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra)
    Simpson, VR
    Gavier-Widen, D
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2000, 147 (09) : 239 - 241
  • [36] REPRODUCTION IN EURASIAN WILD BOAR IN CENTRAL PUNJAB, PAKISTAN
    AHMAD, E
    BROOKS, JE
    HUSSAIN, I
    KHAN, MH
    ACTA THERIOLOGICA, 1995, 40 (02): : 163 - 173
  • [37] A PRESUMED WILD HYBRID BALDPATE X EURASIAN WIGEON
    WATSON, GE
    AUK, 1970, 87 (02): : 353 - &
  • [38] Whole-genome resequencing uncovers molecular signatures of natural and sexual selection in wild bighorn sheep
    Kardos, Marty
    Luikart, Gordon
    Bunch, Rowan
    Dewey, Sarah
    Edwards, William
    McWilliam, Sean
    Stephenson, John
    Allendorf, Fred W.
    Hogg, John T.
    Kijas, James
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2015, 24 (22) : 5616 - 5632
  • [39] Segregation of floral characters in the wild oxlip
    Weiss, FE
    NATURE, 1931, 128 : 305 - 305
  • [40] A rare wild sheep.
    Lydekker, R
    NATURE, 1902, 66 : 32 - 32