Analysis of the accuracy of Z-scores of non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal Trisomies 13, 18, and 21 that employs the ion proton semiconductor sequencing platform

被引:20
|
作者
Tian, Yuan [1 ]
Zhang, Linlin [1 ]
Tian, Weifang [1 ]
Gao, Jinshuang [1 ]
Jia, Liting [1 ]
Cui, Shihong [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Clin Lab, 7 Front Kangfu St, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, 7 Front Kangfu St, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS | 2018年 / 11卷
关键词
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT); False positive; Confined placental mosaicism (CPM); Trisomies; CELL-FREE DNA; MOSAICISM; FRACTION; PLASMA; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13039-018-0397-x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is frequently being used to screen for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 for prenatal diagnosis. However, NIPT performs poorly when compared with invasive testing and thus should not be used to diagnose trisomies. The result of NIPT for an individual woman in most genome-wide methods is calculated as a Z-score. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between Z-scores of NIPT results and the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing. Results: We evaluated 108 pregnant women with positive NIPT results, which were validated through karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid puncture by means of sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and follow-up. Utilizing the ion proton semiconductor sequencing platform, we report a performance evaluation of NIPT-positive results at Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University of Henan Province, China, by classifying Z-scores as 3 <= Z<5, 5 <= Z < 9 and Z >= 9. The findings indicate that positive NIPT results at Z >= 9 have a higher accuracy compared with positive NIPT results at 5 <= Z < 9 and 3 <= Z<5. Conclusions: The findings show that Z-scores of NIPT results are closely related to the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing. However, false-positive NIPT results at 3 <= Z<5 may occur due to confined placental mosaicism (CPM).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [11] Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non-invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
    Deans, Zandra C.
    Allen, Stephanie
    Jenkins, Lucy
    Khawaja, Farrah
    Hastings, Ros J.
    Mann, Kathy
    Patton, Simon J.
    Sistermans, Erik A.
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 37 (07) : 699 - 704
  • [12] The Feasibility Study of Non-Invasive Fetal Trisomy 18 and 21 Detection with Semiconductor Sequencing Platform
    Jeon, Young Joo
    Zhou, Yulin
    Li, Yihan
    Guo, Qiwei
    Chen, Jinchun
    Quan, Shengmao
    Zhang, Ahong
    Zheng, Hailing
    Zhu, Xingqiang
    Lin, Jin
    Xu, Huan
    Wu, Ayang
    Park, Sin-Gi
    Kim, Byung Chul
    Joo, Hee Jae
    Chen, Hongliang
    Bhak, Jong
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [13] Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146 958 pregnancies
    Zhang, H.
    Gao, Y.
    Jiang, F.
    Fu, M.
    Yuan, Y.
    Guo, Y.
    Zhu, Z.
    Lin, M.
    Liu, Q.
    Tian, Z.
    Zhang, H.
    Chen, F.
    Lau, T. K.
    Zhao, L.
    Yi, X.
    Yin, Y.
    Wang, W.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 530 - 538
  • [14] Retrospective details of false-positive and false-negative results in non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13
    Suzumori, Nobuhiro
    Sekizawa, Akihiko
    Takeda, Eri
    Samura, Osamu
    Sasaki, Aiko
    Akaishi, Rina
    Wada, Seiji
    Hamanoue, Haruka
    Hirahara, Fumiki
    Sawai, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    Yamada, Takahiro
    Miura, Kiyonori
    Masuzaki, Hideaki
    Nakayama, Setsuko
    Kamei, Yoshimasa
    Namba, Akira
    Murotsuki, Jun
    Yamaguchi, Masayuki
    Tairaku, Shinya
    Maeda, Kazuhisa
    Kaji, Takashi
    Okamoto, Yoko
    Endo, Masayuki
    Ogawa, Masaki
    Kasai, Yasuyo
    Ichizuka, Kiyotake
    Yamada, Naoki
    Ida, Akinori
    Miharu, Norio
    Kawaguchi, Satoshi
    Hasuo, Yasuyuki
    Okazaki, Tetsuya
    Ichikawa, Mayuko
    Izumi, Shunichiro
    Kuno, Naohiko
    Yotsumoto, Junko
    Nishiyama, Miyuki
    Shirato, Nahoko
    Hirose, Tatsuko
    Sago, Haruhiko
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 256 : 75 - 81
  • [15] Combined Z-scores to assess the impact of rare autosomal trisomies that results in non-invasive prenatal screening on pregnancy outcomes
    Tang, Xinxin
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Chen, Min
    Zhang, Yue
    Du, Yunqiu
    Zhang, Fang
    Tan, Juan
    Yin, Ting
    Wang, Leilei
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2024, 554
  • [16] Re: Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146 958 pregnancies
    Benn, P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 512 - 513
  • [17] A Critical Evaluation of Validation and Clinical Experience Studies in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and Monosomy X
    Demko, Zachary
    Prigmore, Brittany
    Benn, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (16)
  • [18] Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non-invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    Khalil, A.
    Forman, M.
    Hulme, R.
    Mazey, R.
    Mousa, H. A.
    Johnstone, E. D.
    McKelvey, A.
    Cohen, K. E.
    Risley, M.
    Denman, W.
    Kelly, B.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 47 (02) : 188 - 193
  • [19] Clinical performance of non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancies: A cohort study and a systematic meta-analysis
    He, Yuting
    Wang, Yichong
    Li, Zhuyu
    Chen, Haitian
    Deng, Jiankai
    Huang, Hao
    He, Xiaohong
    Zeng, Wentao
    Liu, Min
    Huang, Bin
    Chen, Peisong
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (06) : 731 - 743
  • [20] Correlation between Z score, fetal fraction, and sequencing reads in non-invasive prenatal testing
    Balslev-Harder, Marie
    Richter, Stine R.
    Kjaergaard, Susanne
    Johansen, Peter
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 37 (09) : 943 - 945