Size selection of alternative prey relative to the abundance of primary prey: pine marten hunting for frogs

被引:7
|
作者
Zalewska, Karolina [1 ]
Zalewski, Andrzej [2 ]
机构
[1] Stoczek 1, PL-17230 Bialowieza, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Mammal Res Inst, PL-17230 Bialowieza, Poland
关键词
BIALOWIEZA-NATIONAL-PARK; DECIDUOUS FOREST; FUNCTIONAL-RESPONSES; E POLAND; PREDATION; FOOD; GENERALIST; POPULATION; DYNAMICS; VOLES;
D O I
10.5735/086.056.0105
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
According to optimal foraging theory, a predator should select the most beneficial prey in terms of energy gain relative to handling time. For the pine marten (Martes martes), rodents such as bank voles are the primary prey; however, the pine marten can switch to a variety of secondary prey items (e.g., birds, fruit and frogs) when the rodent abundance is low. We measured frog ilia found in pine marten scats during several consecutive years to assess whether the body mass of consumed frogs varied with changes in rodent abundance. Rodent density was inversely related to the frequency of occurrence of frogs in the marten's diet. Moreover, during the years with low rodent abundance, pine martens ate smaller frogs than in the years with high rodent availability. The average frog weight (18 g) during the years with high rodent density was similar to average vole weight, suggesting that prey of this size has an optimal ratio of foraging effort to energetic gain. During the lean years, martens preyed on frogs smaller than the average vole weight, and during spring this frog size-group is usually the most abundant in the environment. Our results suggest that functional responses of predators to low abundance of primary prey involve not only a prey-switch but also a decrease in the size of secondary prey consumed. Fluctuations in the proportion of frogs eaten in relation to yearly rodent density can affect both marten and frog population demography.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of the Relative Abundance of Potential Prey to the Diet of the Louisiana Pine Snake (Pituophis ruthveni)
    Broussard, Alyssa A.
    Hoffman, Justin D.
    Lyons, Eddie K.
    LeMieux, Frederick
    SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST, 2022, 21 (02) : 93 - 106
  • [12] PREY SIZE AND HUNTING METHODS OF THE CROWNED EAGLE
    DANEEL, ABC
    OSTRICH, 1979, 50 (02) : 120 - 121
  • [13] Seasonal and individual variation in selection by feral cats for areas with widespread primary prey and localised alternative prey
    Cruz, Jennyffer
    Woolmore, Chris
    Latham, M. Cecilia
    Latham, A. David M.
    Pech, Roger P.
    Anderson, Dean P.
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 41 (08) : 650 - 661
  • [14] Indirect effects of primary prey population dynamics on alternative prey
    Barraquand, Frederic
    New, Leslie F.
    Redpath, Stephen
    Matthiopoulos, Jason
    THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 103 : 44 - 59
  • [15] FORAGING COSTS AND RELATIVE PREY SIZE
    GRIFFITHS, D
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1980, 116 (05): : 743 - 752
  • [16] Prey selection by harbour seals, Phoca vitulina, in relation to variations in prey abundance
    Tollit, DJ
    Greenstreet, SPR
    Thompson, PM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1997, 75 (09) : 1508 - 1518
  • [17] Selection of waterbirds by Geoffroy's cat: Effects of prey abundance, size, and distance
    Canepuccia, A. D.
    Martinez, M. M.
    Vassallo, A. I.
    MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY, 2007, 72 (03) : 163 - 173
  • [18] Response of predators to prey abundance: separating the effects of prey density and patch size
    Wellenreuther, M
    Connell, SD
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2002, 273 (01) : 61 - 71
  • [19] What size of Neotropical frogs do spiders prey on?
    Meneses, Afonso Santiago de Oliveira
    Correa, Bruno Alessandro Augusto Pena
    Fernandes, Mateus de Alencar Ramos
    Lopes, Bruno Eduardo Pires de Camargos
    Citeli, Nathalie Kaladinsky
    Brandao, Reuber Albuquerque
    BIOLOGIA, 2021, 76 (03) : 919 - 932
  • [20] What size of Neotropical frogs do spiders prey on?
    Afonso Santiago de Oliveira Meneses
    Bruno Alessandro Augusto Peña Corrêa
    Mateus de Alencar Ramos Fernandes
    Bruno Eduardo Pires de Camargos Lopes
    Nathalie Kaladinsky Citeli
    Reuber Albuquerque Brandão
    Biologia, 2021, 76 : 919 - 932