Efficiency of water and nutrient use in containerised plants irrigated by overhead, drip or capillary irrigation

被引:16
|
作者
Goodwin, PB [1 ]
Murphy, M
Melville, P
Yiasoumi, W
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Land Water & Crop Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] NSW Agr, Windsor, NSW 2756, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1071/EA02030
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This paper reports an assessment of the potential of an irrigation system based on capillary matting in comparison to the industry standard, overhead irrigation, and to drip irrigation, for plants growing in pots. The systems were evaluated on the basis of the dry weights of the plants grown, water-use efficiency (volume of runoff) and the environmental impact of the systems. The environmental impact was assessed by the volumes of runoff and the amounts of nitrate nitrogen and phosphate phosphorus in the runoff. Rose and tomato grew on capillary mat as large as or larger than (dry weight) with drip or overhead irrigation when controlled-release fertiliser (Osmocote Plus, 5-6 month release) was mixed through the medium. Lavender and pansy showed no significant difference between the irrigation systems. However, when the fertiliser was applied to the surface or in the dibble hole, pansy, dianthus and anisodontea grew larger with overhead than with capillary irrigation. The volumes of water used by the drip and capillary systems were about equal at 2.6 and 3.3 L/pot. week, respectively, as were the volumes of runoff produced, 0.43 and 0.39 L/pot. week, but both were far lower than the corresponding values for the overhead system, where water use was 7.13 L/pot. week, and the runoff 3.00 L/pot. week. At the end of the trial, plants grown with capillary irrigation had a high electrical conductivity in the surface layers of the pots when controlled-release fertiliser was either mixed evenly through (1997, EC 2.04 dS/m) or was applied to the top of the mix (1998, EC 0.87 dS/m). On the other hand, with overhead watering the EC was more evenly distributed (1997, EC range 0.30-0.36 dS/m) or highest at the bottom of the pot (1998, EC 0.97 dS/m). The concentrations of nutrients in the runoff from the capillary mat system, nitrate nitrogen 6.2 mg/L and phosphate phosphorus 0.12 mg/L, were lower than those for either of the other systems, overhead giving 9.7 and 0.49 mg/L and drip 11.5 and 0.49 mg/L of nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively. Total nutrient leaching per week for nitrate and phosphate, respectively, was 320 and 16.2 mg/m(2) for overhead, 53.9 and 3.1 mg/m(2) for drip and 26.4 and 0.50 mg/m(2) for capillary irrigation. Thus, capillary irrigation gave more efficient water and nutrient use and reduced nutrient contamination of the environment compared with the drip or overhead irrigation systems.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 194
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Drip irrigation with suitable saline water improves water use efficiency for cotton
    Hou, Z. (hzatyl@163.com), 1600, Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (29):
  • [22] Study on water use of drip irrigated peach tree under the conditions of fully irrigated and regulated deficit irrigation
    Li, Guang-Yong
    Wang, Xiao-Wei
    Huang, Xing-Fa
    Zhang, Xiao-Ming
    Shuili Xuebao/Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001, (09):
  • [23] NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTION, GROWTH, AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN MAIZE FOLLOWING WINTER WHEAT IRRIGATED BY SPRINKLERS OR SURFACE IRRIGATION
    Lv, Guohua
    Kang, Yaohu
    Li, Lan
    Liu, Shiping
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2011, 60 (03) : 338 - 347
  • [24] Gravel vertical mulching for improving water use efficiency of drip irrigated orchards
    Yanni, S
    Nimah, MN
    Bashour, I
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IVTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IRRIGATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, 2004, (664): : 673 - 681
  • [25] Comparing Water Use Efficiency in South Texas Furrow and Drip Irrigated Cabbage
    Fuentes, Corina
    Enciso, Juan
    Nelson, Shad D.
    Lopez, Rafael
    Ribera, Luis
    Anciso, Juan R.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2014, 49 (09) : S266 - S266
  • [26] WATER-USE EFFICIENCY, GROWTH, AND YIELDS OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED TOMATOES
    PHENE, CJ
    HILE, MMS
    RE, JV
    PATTON, SH
    HORTSCIENCE, 1984, 19 (03) : 582 - 582
  • [27] Fertiliser use efficiency by containerised nursery plants. 1. Plant growth and nutrient uptake
    Huett, D. O.
    Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 48 (02):
  • [28] Assessment of yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by deficit irrigation
    Hussein, Fuad
    Janat, Mussaddak
    Yakoub, Abdallah
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2011, 35 (06) : 611 - 621
  • [29] Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Drip Irrigated Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at Different Irrigation Intervals and Watering Regimes
    Dagdelen, Necdet
    Sezgin, Fuat
    Gurbuz, Talih
    Yilmaz, Ersel
    Akcay, Selin
    Yesilirmak, Erean
    PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2009, 92 (02): : 193 - 200
  • [30] Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture through variable rate drip irrigation: the case of a pear orchard in Northern Italy
    Ortuani, B.
    Facchi, A.
    Mayer, A.
    Bianchi, A.
    Bianchi, D.
    Brancadoro, L.
    IX INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IRRIGATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, 2022, 1335 : 515 - 522